From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Ossman Subject: Re: Plea for MMC spec owners Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 23:39:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4485F623.5030403@drzeus.cx> References: <77C7F7CB1230A74A9D19C0C111E6EDBE4791EA@DLEE09.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <77C7F7CB1230A74A9D19C0C111E6EDBE4791EA@DLEE09.ent.ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: "Khasim, Syed" Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Khasim, Syed wrote: > > Pierre, this is clearly defined in spec. It's mandatory for a MMC (of > any size) to start with a 512M block on a soft reset / power on. > Then I guess the spec would be self-contradictory as the section you quoted earlier clearly stated that only READ_BL_LEN/WRITE_BL_LEN was valid if *_BL_PARTIAL wasn't set. Rgds Pierre