From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Behme Subject: Re: GPMC timings for smc91x on 24xx (WAS: Pending July patches) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:42:01 +0200 Message-ID: <44DF3A39.7010302@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces+gplao-linux-omap-open-source=gmane.org@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces+gplao-linux-omap-open-source=gmane.org@linux.omap.com To: "Woodruff, Richard" , linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Woodruff, Richard wrote: ... > No body waits. ... > OMAP3 isn't so far off. ... >>>Thanks for the good work. >> >>Whatever. Rather thank Komal for all the good work on merging TI code. > > Generally we try and help where we can in this forum. I do help Komal > and you and others where I can. Boards, data clarification, some > code... Maybe TI can consider to create something like a OSK for OMAP2 and/or OMAP3? It's my feeling that there are many people who are able and willing to work on OMAP code, and OSK was a big success regarding this. But I think for this easy access to HW and documentation is necessary. I think not everybody who is able and willing to help improving OMAP code has a purchasing department, lawyers, project managers and all this stuff which sometimes seems to be necessary to get the HW and information to help. Opinions? Regards Dirk