From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Behme Subject: Re: Building kenel error Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:50:23 +0200 Message-ID: <44E60BEF.2090507@gmail.com> References: <1155918292.2949.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1155918292.2949.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: hkh@cypress.com Cc: Linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hingkwan Huen wrote: > Which version of tool chain are > you using for 2.6.16 or 2.6.17 kernel? Regarding GCC 4.x.x, if you like prebuild toolchain, try CodeSourcery: http://www.codesourcery.com/gnu_toolchains/arm/ If you like to build your toolchain on our own, try crosstool: http://kegel.com/crosstool/ crosstool-0.42 with eval `cat arm.dat gcc-4.1.0-glibc-2.3.2.dat` sh all.sh --notest configuration and additional patch (for ALSA sound) http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/csl/sourcerygxx-4_1/gcc/cse.c?r1=115616&r2=115615&view=patch&pathrev=115616 (fixes http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363) works for me. There may be several other working GCC 4.x.x toolchains out there. But I think most people still use GCC 3.x.x toolchains. Dirk