From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lamikr Subject: Re: Building kenel error Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:29:43 +0300 Message-ID: <44E62337.5090604@cc.jyu.fi> References: Reply-To: lamikr@cc.jyu.fi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: "Woodruff, Richard" Cc: Linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Woodruff, Richard wrote: >> I never had success of using gcc-4.0.2 and later on 2.6.16/17 kernel. >> > So > >> I just stick with the older gcc-3.4.1. Which version of tool chain are >> you using for 2.6.16 or 2.6.17 kernel? Any advantages of using the >> > later > >> version of the compiler? >> Thanks, >> kwan >> > > We have to use several different versions. Currently I use 3.4.0, > 3.4.3, and 3.3.1 on older kernels. On the latest kernels we will use > 4.1.0. We have built these, gotten them from a vendor, or gotten from > www.codesourcery.com . > > One of the main reasons for using CodeSourcery based tool chains is they > provide newer ARM support though ARMv7 (including VFP & VFP2). If you > are doing gaming with the OMAP2 3d core it can provide a nice boost. > Do you know does codesourcery or somebody else done yet eabi gcc that would support armv4 or armv4t? Mika