From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Ossman Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] [RFC] Add MMC Password Protection (lock/unlock) support V5 Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:31:59 +0100 Message-ID: <4544750F.4000301@drzeus.cx> References: <20061020164914.012378000@localhost.localdomain> <20061020165134.378993000@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20061020165134.378993000@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Carlos Aguiar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com, David Brownell , Tony Lindgren , Russell King , ilias.biris@indt.org.br List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Carlos Aguiar wrote: > +int mmc_key_instantiate(struct key *key, const void *data, size_t datalen) > static > +int mmc_key_match(const struct key *key, const void *description) > static > +void mmc_key_destroy(struct key *key) > static > @@ -335,6 +403,15 @@ static int __init mmc_init(void) > ret = class_register(&mmc_host_class); > if (ret) > bus_unregister(&mmc_bus_type); > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_PASSWORDS > + else { > + ret = register_key_type(&mmc_key_type); > + if (ret) { > + class_unregister(&mmc_host_class); > + bus_unregister(&mmc_bus_type); > + } > + } > +#endif > } > return ret; > } > We're starting to get a bit of code duplication here. Perhaps an error handling section at the end of the function would be better. Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org