From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Behme Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP MMC fixes Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:32:35 +0100 Message-ID: <454501D3.2050009@gmail.com> References: <200610282034.05218.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <200610282040.09413.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200610282040.09413.marek.vasut@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces+gplao-linux-omap-open-source=gmane.org@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces+gplao-linux-omap-open-source=gmane.org@linux.omap.com To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Marek_Va=B9ut?= Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Marek Va=B9ut wrote: > oops, sorry, I missed the previous patch ... ;) To get it right: You used 1 << data->blksz in your patch. I=20 think it should only be data->blksz without additional shift=20 because shift is already included in data->blksz? http://source.mvista.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=3Dlinux-omap-2.6.git;a=3Dblobdi= ff;h=3D5b9caa7978d34311839840243e38921255f6da4b;hp=3D74eaaee66de0e59532ba= 5655fddac5aaeea5ba08;hb=3D132919ba80ad207755fe271277bfefff865a54fe;f=3Ddr= ivers/mmc/mmc.c So, do you think http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/linux-omap-open-source/2006-October/00818= 3.html is correct? Thanks Dirk