From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Behme Subject: Re: Realtime patch on OMAP2 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:46:07 +0100 Message-ID: <458A57DF.1020605@gmail.com> References: <20731908.192991166666790293.JavaMail.weblogic@ep_ml29> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20731908.192991166666790293.JavaMail.weblogic@ep_ml29> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: kyungmin.park@samsung.com, linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Kyungmin Park wrote: > With Dirk Behme's mail, I try he realtime preemption patch on OMAP2 Thanks for testing :) > Second, smc91x timeout problem > - I found a patch in kernel-mailing list [1]. > but I'm not sure it's correct patch. but after the patch. it's working. All: Do we need to fix arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c here? [2] > And it's another issue with ethernet irq flag value > In clean Linus kernel has IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING. but in OMAP tree has IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH on apollon. > As previous mentions. IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH is not working. Kyungmin Park: Reading your previous post, Linus' mainline is okay (IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING), while our OMAP git (IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH) needs fix for you? Can you test patch I sent some minutes ago? Dirk > [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116576871105029&w=2 [2] http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0612.1/1036.html