From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Behme Subject: Re: Pending patches, was: Git tree updated to 2.6.23-rc2 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:23:54 +0200 Message-ID: <46C46C0A.1070008@googlemail.com> References: <20070806125225.GA2312@atomide.com> <46BCB2BD.1090905@mvista.com> <3B6D69C3A9EBCA4BA5DA60D913027429019C4F78@dlee13.ent.ti.com> <20070813090623.GK13948@atomide.com> <46C08DD5.5090001@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46C08DD5.5090001@mvista.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Kevin Hilman wrote: > Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>* Woodruff, Richard [070810 13:16]: >> >>>>Can you undo this 1/3 nand patch? 2430 doesn't build without the other >>>>2 patches due to some missing header (asm/arch/nand.h) that come with >>>>the later patches. >>> >>>Kevin for compiles sake I added the missing patches instead of removing. >> >>I reverted the 1/3 nand patch, and applied Richard's two fixes. >>I'll take a closer look at the nand patch this week, let's try to >>get things working for 2430 soon. >> >> >>>There were a couple more fixes which I also added to get it booting. >>> - update defconfig to have vfp >>> - add missing TWL patch >> >>I did not see a TWL patch in your attached patch? > > > Not sure if this is the same one Richard had, but this is what's needed > for a proper build of the 2430 LCD (which stil doesn't work :) > > index 6e5b603..a252d82 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/omap/lcd_2430sdp.c > +++ b/drivers/video/omap/lcd_2430sdp.c > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ > #define LCD_PANEL_BACKLIGHT_GPIO 91 > #define LCD_PANEL_ENABLE_GPIO 154 > #define LCD_PIXCLOCK_MAX 5400 /* freq 5.4 MHz */ > -#define PM_RECEIVER TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECIEVER > +#define PM_RECEIVER TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER > #define ENABLE_VAUX2_DEDICATED 0x09 > #define ENABLE_VAUX2_DEV_GRP 0x20 Is there a special reason that this isn't applied yet or is it just missed because of missing [PATCH] in subject? ;) Cheers Dirk