From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
tony@atomide.com, nsekhar@ti.com, jsarha@ti.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs.
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:58:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47d66f57-d477-4cde-9ac5-26d5397861a6@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170419133853.GA2696@lunn.ch>
On 19/04/17 16:38, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 02:56:48PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 19/04/17 14:39, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:24:26PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>> Some boards [1] leave the PHYs at an invalid state
>>>> during system power-up or reset thus causing unreliability
>>>> issues with the PHY which manifests as PHY not being detected
>>>> or link not functional. To fix this, these PHYs need to be RESET
>>>> via a GPIO connected to the PHY's RESET pin.
>>>>
>>>> Some boards have a single GPIO controlling the PHY RESET pin of all
>>>> PHYs on the bus whereas some others have separate GPIOs controlling
>>>> individual PHY RESETs.
>>>>
>>>> In both cases, the RESET de-assertion cannot be done in the PHY driver
>>>> as the PHY will not probe till its reset is de-asserted.
>>>> So do the RESET de-assertion in the MDIO bus driver.
>>>>
>>>> [1] - am572x-idk, am571x-idk, a437x-idk
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/of/of_mdio.c | 4 ++++
>>>> include/linux/phy.h | 5 +++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> Hi Roger
>>>
>>> Thanks for making this generic.
>>>
>>> Please add device tree binding documentation. I think that actually
>>> means you have to document MDIO in general, since there currently is
>>> not a binding document.
>>
>> OK.
>>
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
>>>> index fa7d51f..25fda2b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
>>>> @@ -22,8 +22,11 @@
>>>> #include <linux/init.h>
>>>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>>>> #include <linux/device.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>>>> #include <linux/of_device.h>
>>>> #include <linux/of_mdio.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>>>> #include <linux/netdevice.h>
>>>> #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
>>>> #include <linux/skbuff.h>
>>>> @@ -43,6 +46,8 @@
>>>>
>>>> #include "mdio-boardinfo.h"
>>>>
>>>> +#define DEFAULT_GPIO_RESET_DELAY 10 /* in microseconds */
>>>> +
>>>> int mdiobus_register_device(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
>>>> {
>>>> if (mdiodev->bus->mdio_map[mdiodev->addr])
>>>> @@ -307,6 +312,7 @@ int __mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *bus, struct module *owner)
>>>> {
>>>> struct mdio_device *mdiodev;
>>>> int i, err;
>>>> + struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
>>>>
>>>> if (NULL == bus || NULL == bus->name ||
>>>> NULL == bus->read || NULL == bus->write)
>>>> @@ -333,6 +339,26 @@ int __mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *bus, struct module *owner)
>>>> if (bus->reset)
>>>> bus->reset(bus);
>>>>
>>>> + /* de-assert bus level PHY GPIO resets */
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < bus->num_reset_gpios; i++) {
>>>> + gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_index(&bus->dev, "reset", i,
>>>> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) {
>>>> + err = PTR_ERR(gpiod);
>>>> + if (err != -ENOENT) {
>>>> + pr_err("mii_bus %s couldn't get reset GPIO\n",
>>>> + bus->id);
>>>> + return err;
>>>> + }
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 1);
>>>
>>>
>>>> + if (!bus->reset_delay_us)
>>>> + bus->reset_delay_us = DEFAULT_GPIO_RESET_DELAY;
>>>
>>> Maybe do this once, where you read the device tree property.
>>
>> I was thinking from point of view that GPIO RESET code should work even without
>> device tree. Although I'm not sure if there would be any users or not.
>
> Hi Roger
>
> I don't see how this would work. What would devm_gpiod_get_index()
> return? Something from ACPI? But then there would be something
Yes or just lookup tables based on platform data.
> equivalent for getting the delay.
I'm not sure about delay part.
>
> Lets keep it simple and OF only. If there is a real need for something
> in addition to OF, it can be added later.
OK. I'll revise the patch based on your comments.
cheers,
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-20 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-05 8:33 [PATCH] net: davinci_mdio: add GPIO reset logic Roger Quadros
2017-04-05 15:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-06 9:15 ` Roger Quadros
2017-04-06 12:05 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-06 16:48 ` Roger Quadros
2017-04-08 13:55 ` David Miller
2017-04-08 15:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-08 15:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-04-10 7:52 ` Roger Quadros
2017-04-19 9:24 ` [PATCH] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs Roger Quadros
2017-04-19 11:39 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-19 11:56 ` Roger Quadros
2017-04-19 13:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-20 7:58 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2017-04-20 8:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Roger Quadros
2017-04-20 13:13 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-20 13:56 ` Roger Quadros
2017-04-20 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 net-next] " Roger Quadros
2017-04-21 1:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-21 1:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-04-21 1:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-21 8:04 ` Roger Quadros
2017-04-21 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 " Roger Quadros
2017-04-21 13:31 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2017-04-23 23:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-24 9:04 ` Roger Quadros
2017-04-24 16:32 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-04-25 16:22 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2017-04-25 16:31 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-04-26 10:46 ` Roger Quadros
2017-04-26 12:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-26 10:43 ` Roger Quadros
2017-04-24 16:40 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47d66f57-d477-4cde-9ac5-26d5397861a6@ti.com \
--to=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jsarha@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox