Re: [beagleboard] Re: TWL4030 intermittent freakout on boot

Dirk Behme
2008-05-09T18:08:11Z

Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> [080508 11:22]:
>
>>Op 8 mei 2008, om 20:13 heeft Paul Walmsley het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>>Hello everyone,
>>>
>>>occasionally the TWL4030 driver on the 3430SDP freaks out on boot.
>>>(This
>>>is either an ES2.0 or ES2.1, not sure.) Here's a partial console
>>>log with
>>>initcall debugging enabled. This probably happens every thirty or
>>>forty
>>>boots, I would guess. The board does boot to userspace when this
>>>happens.
>>>
>>>Perhaps the TWL4030 experts out there might know what's going on?
>>>
>>><3>i2c_omap i2c_omap.1: controller timed out
>>><3>i2c_omap i2c_omap.1: controller timed out
>>><3>twl4030_usb: i2c write failed, line 422
>>
>>Looks suspiciously like the symptons in
>>
>>http://code.google.com/p/beagleboard/issues/detail?id=14
>
>
> This also looks similar to the earlier twl4030 hangs where access
> to some domains caused twl4030 to hang. If twl4030 hangs, there's
> no way to reset it as all control is over I2C. When twl4030 hangs,
> bootloader won't be able to detect the chip either unless devices
> is power cycled (and USB cable detached).
>
> The reason earlier was that twl4030 internal clock was not being
> programmed properly, and was fixed by patch
> 0d81cf7e804c529c58d3054c1b9bdb7b3f1dec5d.

Link for this is

http://source.mvista.com/git/?p=linux-omap-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d81cf7e804c529c58d3054c1b9bdb7b3f1dec5d

I don't know OMAP3 good enough yet, but which clock should we use on
OMAP3 here?

Does it make sense to use osc_ck for OMAP3 instead of osc_sys_ck, too?

E.g something like

...
if (cpu_is_omap2430() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
osc = clk_get(NULL, "osc_ck");
else
osc = clk_get(NULL, "osc_sys_ck");
...

Dirk