From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] OMAP3: CPUidle driver
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:18:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F9F050.3040706@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00ab01c92de9$76890190$LocalHost@wipultra1382>
Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
>> [mailto:linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Hilman
>> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:15 PM
>> To: Rajendra Nayak
>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] OMAP3: CPUidle driver
>>
>> Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> writes:
>>
>>> "Rajendra Nayak" <rnayak@ti.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> This patch set implements Cpuidle driver for OMAP3 platforms. It is
>>>> validated on the 3430SDP (using the omap_3430sdp_min_defconfig) and
>>>> applies on the pm-20081006 branch.
>>> Excellent. Thank you. I'll pull into pm-20081006 today.
>>>
>>> One question: You have C6 to hit chip-off, but it is never enabled.
>>> Has this been tested? Enabling it allows me to hit chip OFF, but it
>>> never comes back from OFF-mode. I will push some patches
>> to make this
>>> work with /sys/power/enable_off_mode.
>> I got this to work on custom HW, but not on 3430SDP. Can you confirm
>> whether or not you can use C6 on 3430SDP? Off-in-idle without CPUidle
>> seems to work, but not with CPUidle + C6.
>>
>>
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> With just this patch below I could see that I was able to hit sysoff even
> with CPUidle.
>
> Doing this I could see the SYSOFF LED toggle..
> # echo -n 1 > /sys/power/clocks_off_while_idle
> # echo -n 1 > /sys/power/sleep_while_idle
> # echo -n 1 > /sys/power/voltage_off_while_idle
> # echo -n 1 > /sys/power/enable_off_mode
>
> And doing this stops the toggle..
> # echo -n 0 > /sys/power/enable_off_mode
>
> Was there any other issue you saw with CPUidle + C6?
>
Yes, I was seeing hangs as soon as I enabled off-mode.
I'm currently on the road and when I get home (Wed.) I won't have access
to an SDP for a while, so I'll trust you on this one. Maybe I need an
updated u-boot on my SDP?
Kevin
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-omap-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-omap-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c 2008-10-14 14:46:21.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-omap-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c 2008-10-14 14:46:24.000000000 +0530
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ void omap_init_power_states(void)
> CPUIDLE_FLAG_CHECK_BM;
>
> /* C6 . MPU OFF + Core OFF */
> - omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C6].valid = 0;
> + omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C6].valid = 1;
> omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C6].type = OMAP3_STATE_C6;
> omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C6].sleep_latency = 10000;
> omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C6].wakeup_latency = 30000;
>
>
>>> Some minor problems that I will fixup when rebasing to the next pm
>>> branch:
>>>
>>> - You removed C0, but all the comments still refer to it
>>> - /sys/power/enable_off_mode doesn't affect off-mode states
>>> in CPUidle
>>>
>>> patch 1:
>>> - I still don't like the #ifdefs for the init sequence.
>>>
>>> patch 2:
>>> - checkpatch warning
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>>> The following C states are defined and used
>>>>
>>>> * C0 . System executing code (Not an idle state)
>>>> * C1 . MPU WFI + Core active
>>>> * C2 . MPU CSWR + Core active
>>>> * C3 . MPU OFF + Core active
>>>> * C4 . MPU CSWR + Core CSWR
>>>> * C5 . MPU OFF + Core CSWR
>>>> * C6 . MPU OFF + Core OFF
>>>>
>>>> CPUidle support is not enabled by default in any of the
>> defconfigs and hence has to enabled seperately
>>>> if you plan to test these patches.
>>>>
>>>> CPUIdle ---> [*] CPU idle PM support
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Rajendra
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> linux-omap" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-19 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-08 12:00 [PATCH 00/05] OMAP3: CPUidle driver Rajendra Nayak
2008-10-09 13:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2008-10-09 14:44 ` Kevin Hilman
2008-10-10 3:47 ` Rajendra Nayak
2008-10-14 10:41 ` Rajendra Nayak
2008-10-18 14:18 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2008-10-10 3:44 ` Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48F9F050.3040706@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox