Re: [PATCH] DSPBRIDGE Fix for auto image load updated

[Ameya Palande <ameya.palande@nokia.com>]

ext Gupta, Ramesh wrote:
> From 757beb63e8e66c168231dd990440816fc5789d6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ramesh Gupta <grgupta@ti.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:32:31 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] DSPBRIDGE Fix for auto image load updated
> Resending as the previous patch was not applyng cleanly.
> This is updated patch to fix the auto image loading while bridgedriver initialization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ramesh Gupta G <grgupta@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv_interface.c |   32 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv_interface.c b/drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv_interface.c
> index 3ad7a43..80edc4d 100755
> --- a/drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv_interface.c
> +++ b/drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv_interface.c
> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static int __init bridge_init(void)
>  		REG_SetValue(NULL, NULL, AUTOSTART, REG_DWORD, (u8 *)&temp,
>  			    sizeof(temp));
>  		REG_SetValue(NULL, NULL, DEFEXEC, REG_SZ, (u8 *)base_img,
> -                           strlen(base_img) + 1);
> +						strlen(base_img) + 1);
>  	} else {
>  		temp = false;
>  		REG_SetValue(NULL, NULL, AUTOSTART, REG_DWORD, (u8 *)&temp,
> @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static int __init bridge_init(void)
>  		REG_SetValue(NULL, NULL, DEFEXEC, REG_SZ, (u8 *) "\0", (u32)2);
>  	}
>  	REG_SetValue(NULL, NULL, NUMPROCS, REG_SZ, (u8 *) num_procs,
> -                   strlen(num_procs) + 1);
> +						strlen(num_procs) + 1);
>  
>  	if (shm_size >= 0x10000) {	/* 64 KB */
>  		initStatus = REG_SetValue(NULL, NULL, SHMSIZE, REG_DWORD,
> @@ -450,18 +450,9 @@ static int __init bridge_init(void)
>  			    sizeof(tc_wordswapon));
>  	}
>  	if (DSP_SUCCEEDED(initStatus)) {
> -		driverContext = DSP_Init(&initStatus);
> -		if (DSP_FAILED(initStatus)) {
> -			status = -1;
> -			GT_0trace(driverTrace, GT_7CLASS,
> -				 "DSP/BIOS Bridge initialization Failed\n");
> -		} else {
> -			GT_0trace(driverTrace, GT_5CLASS,
> -					"DSP/BIOS Bridge driver loaded\n");
> -		}
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_DVFS
> -		for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
> -                       pdata->mpu_speed[i] = vdd1_rate_table_bridge[i].rate;
> +		for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
> +			pdata->mpu_speed[i] = vdd1_rate_table_bridge[i].rate;
>  
>  		clk_handle = clk_get(NULL, "iva2_ck");
>  		if (!clk_handle) {
> @@ -479,6 +470,15 @@ static int __init bridge_init(void)
>  			"clk_notifier_register FAIL for iva2_ck \n");
>  		}
>  #endif
> +		driverContext = DSP_Init(&initStatus);
> +		if (DSP_FAILED(initStatus)) {
> +			status = -1;
> +			GT_0trace(driverTrace, GT_7CLASS,
> +				 "DSP/BIOS Bridge initialization Failed\n");
> +		} else {
> +			GT_0trace(driverTrace, GT_5CLASS,
> +					"DSP/BIOS Bridge driver loaded\n");
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	DBC_Assert(status == 0);
> @@ -655,11 +655,11 @@ func_cont:
>  				(struct DRV_OBJECT *)hDrvObject, &pPctxt);
>  
>  	if (pPctxt != NULL) {
> -               /* Return PID instead of process handle */
> -               hProcess = current->pid;
> +			/* Return PID instead of process handle */
> +			hProcess = current->pid;
>  
>  		DRV_ProcUpdatestate(pPctxt, PROC_RES_ALLOCATED);
> -               DRV_ProcSetPID(pPctxt, hProcess);
> +			DRV_ProcSetPID(pPctxt, hProcess);
>  	}
>  #endif
>  

Hi Ramesh,

I am not clear about the issue which this patch fixes.
As I understand that:

1. You have increased the count for 
pdata->mpu_speed[i] = vdd1_rate_table_bridge[i].rate;

2. Moved driverContext = DSP_Init(&initStatus) after 
clk_notifier_register stuff.

3. Coding Style cleanups.

I am not able to understand what this patch is fixing and how?
Some explanation about this will be helpful.

Thanks.

Cheers,
Ameya.