From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl4030 VAUX3 supports 3.0V Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:36:25 +0200 Message-ID: <49BF52F9.2030708@nokia.com> References: <49B11EB0.30809@nokia.com> <200903061116.21544.david-b@pacbell.net> <20090306221842.GB15728@sirena.org.uk> <200903061448.43749.david-b@pacbell.net> <1236599245.6781.86.camel@vega.slimlogic.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:39686 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752743AbZCQHgJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:36:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1236599245.6781.86.camel@vega.slimlogic.co.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Liam Girdwood Cc: David Brownell , Mark Brown , LKML , linux-omap Mailing List Liam Girdwood wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 14:48 -0800, David Brownell wrote: >> On Friday 06 March 2009, Mark Brown wrote: >>> Would it make sense to make this platform data so that if a given board >>> requires running the chip like this it can be enabled for those boards >>> but it's not something people might turn on because it seems useful? >> Let's hear if it's actually needed, first. :) >> >> I coded those tables so that it would be easy to kick in the >> support for out-of-spec operation if it's really needed. But >> so far we don't know that it's needed, and I'd rather it not >> be too easy to run like that. >> > > I've now reverted this patch. TI say we can use VAUX3 at 3V and expect no problems: http://community.ti.com/forums/p/3777/14574.aspx So how do we do it?