Re: Benchmarking: POP flash vs. MMC?

[Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@yandex.ru>]

Russ Dill wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@yandex.ru> wrote:
>> David Hagood wrote:
>>> Well, that's not what I would have expected - I would have thought
>>> reads on POP would have been faster than that, and cheaper - the SD
>>> being the same speed but less CPU is surprising.
>> 1. As Russ and David said, OneNAND driver does not really
>> use DMA, because the I/O is done in 2K chunks, and this
>> is just too small piece of data for DMA.
> 
> All very relevant, but just to avoid confusion; the tests were
> performed on a Beagleboard with 256MB of Micron NAND.
 
Ok, sorry. The CRC part should be relevant.
The bulk_read part may also be relevant if your HW is
able to read multiple NAND pages faster than reading
them one-by-one. The compression links should be
helpful for compressor selection.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html