From: Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com>
To: "ext Premi, Sanjeev" <premi@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: OMAP: Fix build with CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE set
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 09:57:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DC4ACD.9080203@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B85A65D85D7EB246BE421B3FB0FBB59301CC7975F2@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
ext Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
>> [mailto:linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Roger Quadros
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 4:49 PM
>> To: ext Roger Quadros
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: OMAP: Fix build with CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE set
>>
>> The patch fixes the following link errors
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function
>> `omap3_round_to_table_rate':
>> /home/roger/maemo/linux/linux-roverx/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock
>> 34xx.c:956:
>> undefined reference to `mpu_opps'
>> /home/roger/maemo/linux/linux-roverx/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock
>> 34xx.c:956:
>> undefined reference to `dsp_opps'
>> /home/roger/maemo/linux/linux-roverx/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock
>> 34xx.c:956:
>> undefined reference to `l3_opps'
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function
>> `omap2_clk_init_cpufreq_table':
>> /home/roger/maemo/linux/linux-roverx/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock
>> 34xx.c:719:
>> undefined reference to `mpu_opps'
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap3_select_table_rate':
>> /home/roger/maemo/linux/linux-roverx/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock
>> 34xx.c:1020:
>> undefined reference to `mpu_opps'
>> /home/roger/maemo/linux/linux-roverx/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock
>> 34xx.c:1020:
>> undefined reference to `dsp_opps'
>> /home/roger/maemo/linux/linux-roverx/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock
>> 34xx.c:1020:
>> undefined reference to `l3_opps'
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap2_init_common_hw':
>> /home/roger/maemo/linux/linux-roverx/arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:
>> 241: undefined
>> reference to `omap_pm_if_early_init'
>> /home/roger/maemo/linux/linux-roverx/arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:
>> 246: undefined
>> reference to `omap_pm_if_init'
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap2_clk_init':
>> /home/roger/maemo/linux/linux-roverx/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock
>> 34xx.c:887:
>> undefined reference to `mpu_opps'
>> /home/roger/maemo/linux/linux-roverx/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock
>> 34xx.c:887:
>> undefined reference to `l3_opps'
>> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>>
>>
>> ext Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> From: Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:10:29 +0300
>>> Subject: [PATCH] PM: OMAP: Fix build with CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE set
>>>
>>> Removes undefined symbol link errors. Required symbols are
>> defined in
>>> common.c and omap-pm.h
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c | 6 ++++++
>>> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
>> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
>>> index 2866612..634ca39 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
>>> @@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ int omap_bootloader_tag_len;
>>> struct omap_board_config_kernel *omap_board_config;
>>> int omap_board_config_size;
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE
>>> +struct omap_opp *mpu_opps;
>>> +struct omap_opp *dsp_opps;
>>> +struct omap_opp *l3_opps;
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_BOOT_TAG
>>>
>>> static int __init parse_tag_omap(const struct tag *tag)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
>>> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
>>> index f0bbd36..6a8499a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
>>> @@ -58,9 +58,20 @@ extern struct omap_opp *l3_opps;
>>> * framework starts. The "_if_" is to avoid name
>> collisions with the
>>> * PM idle-loop code.
>>> */
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE
>>> +static inline int __init omap_pm_if_early_init(struct omap_opp
>>> *mpu_opp_table,
>>> + struct omap_opp *dsp_opp_table,
>>> + struct omap_opp *l3_opp_table) {
>>> + mpu_opps = 0;
>>> + dsp_opps = 0;
>>> + l3_opps = 0;
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +#else
>>> int __init omap_pm_if_early_init(struct omap_opp *mpu_opp_table,
>>> struct omap_opp *dsp_opp_table,
>>> struct omap_opp *l3_opp_table);
>>> +#endif
>>>
>
> [sp] Instead of creating 'dummy' variables ans initializing them to
> 0; wouldn't it be better to redefine omap_pm_if_early_init()
> with no arguments under CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE.
>
> I have not checked in detail; but not sure impact of
> "return -EINVAL" in resulting from the initializations above.
>
> We may just need a clean-up to get all functions where *_opp
> variables are used.
>
> Also, I have not checked if the updated clock infra has any
> impact to the functions causing compile errors.
>
> Best regards,
> Sanjeev
>
I get your point. The reason why i used dummy variables for opps was that they
are used at quite some places and are always checked for != 0 before use.
If dummy opp variables are not defined then we'll have to check for
CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE at all those places, which i too am ok with.
Which one is a better approach?
-roger.
>>> /**
>>> * omap_pm_if_init - OMAP PM init code called after clock fw init
>>> @@ -68,7 +79,11 @@ int __init omap_pm_if_early_init(struct omap_opp
>>> *mpu_opp_table,
>>> * The main initialization code. OPP tables are passed in
>> here. The
>>> * "_if_" is to avoid name collisions with the PM idle-loop code.
>>> */
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE
>>> +static inline int __init omap_pm_if_init(void) { return 0; }
>>> +#else
>>> int __init omap_pm_if_init(void);
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> /**
>>> * omap_pm_if_exit - OMAP PM exit code
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> linux-omap" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-08 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-07 8:57 [PATCH] PM: OMAP: Fix build with CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE set Roger Quadros
2009-04-07 11:18 ` Roger Quadros
2009-04-07 15:01 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2009-04-08 6:57 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49DC4ACD.9080203@nokia.com \
--to=ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=premi@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox