Re: [PATCH 01/13] Revert "ARM: OMAP: Mask interrupts when disabling interrupts, v2"

[Kim Kyuwon <q1.kim@samsung.com>]

Kevin Hilman wrote:
> This reverts commit 5461af5af5c6a7fee78978aafe720541bf3a2f55.
> 
> Adding a disable hook to the irq_chip is not the way to fix the
> problem being addressed by this patch.  Instead, we need to fix
> support for [enable|disable]_irq_wake().

Agree with you if we can use disable_irq_wake for MPU Interrupt with not 
masking the IRQ. Can you explain how we can fix support for 
disable_irq_wake() for omap_irq_chip?

> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c |    1 -
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
> index 998c5c4..08a3b99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
> @@ -134,7 +134,6 @@ static struct irq_chip omap_irq_chip = {
>  	.ack	= omap_mask_ack_irq,
>  	.mask	= omap_mask_irq,
>  	.unmask	= omap_unmask_irq,
> -	.disable = omap_mask_irq,
>  };
>  
>  static void __init omap_irq_bank_init_one(struct omap_irq_bank *bank)