From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: "Sonasath, Moiz" <m-sonasath@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kamat, Nishant" <nskamat@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
"Pandita, Vikram" <vikram.pandita@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [OMAP:I2C]OMAP3430 Silicon Errata 1.153
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:31:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A5E58CA.3030206@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CD8CC2B65FEE304DA95744A5472698F202957C7DB9@dlee06.ent.ti.com>
Sonasath, Moiz had written, on 07/15/2009 05:29 PM, the following:
>
> I am also not sure, if the count=100; value will be enough time for the XUDF
> to be set. If not then it will keep running into timeout errors.
>
Do you mean we need a delay for checking again? that should be easy to
incorporate - what kind of delay are we speaking of here? do you have a
count requirement for handling this? it is essentially the time b/w XRDY
to XUNDF.. this should be deterministic rt?
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-15 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-14 21:21 [PATCH 3/3] [OMAP:I2C]OMAP3430 Silicon Errata 1.153 Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-14 23:23 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-07-15 15:40 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-15 21:43 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-07-15 22:23 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-15 22:27 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-07-15 22:29 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-15 22:31 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2009-07-15 22:37 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-15 23:03 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-07-16 15:52 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-07-20 16:54 ` Sonasath, Moiz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-21 15:15 Sonasath, Moiz
2009-08-03 7:35 ` Paul Walmsley
2009-08-03 20:19 ` Sonasath, Moiz
[not found] ` <CD8CC2B65FEE304DA95744A5472698F202959C0D61-UmuGNrFEPrGIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-10 15:44 ` Sonasath, Moiz
2009-08-10 16:29 ` Paul Walmsley
2009-08-11 16:33 ` Sonasath, Moiz
[not found] ` <CD8CC2B65FEE304DA95744A5472698F20295A89A21-UmuGNrFEPrGIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-16 17:39 ` Paul Walmsley
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908160841160.31720-rwI8Ez+7Ko+d5PgPZx9QOdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-20 17:16 ` Sonasath, Moiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A5E58CA.3030206@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-sonasath@ti.com \
--cc=nskamat@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=vikram.pandita@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox