From: Ben Goska <goskab@onid.oregonstate.edu>
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: arch/arm/mach-omap* organization
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:23:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A776368.1010503@onid.oregonstate.edu> (raw)
Is there a reason why omap2, omap3, and now omap4 files are all packed
into the mach-omap2 directory?
It seems like it would make more sense for each omap version to have
it's own directory.
-Ben Goska
next reply other threads:[~2009-08-03 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-03 22:23 Ben Goska [this message]
2009-08-04 7:05 ` arch/arm/mach-omap* organization Tony Lindgren
2009-08-05 8:39 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A776368.1010503@onid.oregonstate.edu \
--to=goskab@onid.oregonstate.edu \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox