From: Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com>
To: ext Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>, Paul <paul@pwsan.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] OMAP3:PM: Fix OPP scale logic
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:10:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A784F6D.1080404@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1249392595-18758-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com>
ext Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Rev 2 of the patch:
> Ref: http://marc.info/?t=124930700200005&r=1&w=2
>
> While switching from higher OPP to lower OPP,
> current scale logic can fail by switching to lower
> voltage while frequency remains at old value.
>
> This patch adds a cleaner recovery logic and
> additional freq dpll checks. This changes
> program_freq_opp return type in the process
> for program_opp to handle error in a consistent
> manner.
>
> NOTE: I moved the *cur_opp setting to under the
> scratchpad locked region to allow for code
> simplicity - I wonder if anyone sees an issue with it
>
> Tested on:rx-51, ported to pm branch - untested linux-omap
> Patch generated on linux-omap pm branch, commit:
> 7e7377395d6b4576341a6939bf2179f3946f2ea0
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/resource34xx.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/resource34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/resource34xx.c
> index 25535a3..83241c4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/resource34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/resource34xx.c
> @@ -240,13 +240,23 @@ static int program_opp_freq(int res, int target_level, int current_level)
> lock_scratchpad_sem();
> if (res == VDD1_OPP) {
> curr_opp = &curr_vdd1_opp;
> - clk_set_rate(dpll1_clk, mpu_opps[target_level].rate);
> - clk_set_rate(dpll2_clk, dsp_opps[target_level].rate);
> + ret = clk_set_rate(dpll1_clk, mpu_opps[target_level].rate);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + goto out;
> +
> + ret = clk_set_rate(dpll2_clk, dsp_opps[target_level].rate);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + /* reset the dpll1 if failed */
> + clk_set_rate(dpll1_clk, mpu_opps[current_level].rate);
> #ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> - /*Update loops_per_jiffy if processor speed is being changed*/
> - loops_per_jiffy = compute_lpj(loops_per_jiffy,
> - mpu_opps[current_level].rate/1000,
> - mpu_opps[target_level].rate/1000);
> + else
> + /*
> + * Update loops_per_jiffy if processor speed
> + * is being changed
> + */
> + loops_per_jiffy = compute_lpj(loops_per_jiffy,
> + mpu_opps[current_level].rate/1000,
> + mpu_opps[target_level].rate/1000);
> #endif
> } else {
> curr_opp = &curr_vdd2_opp;
> @@ -255,17 +265,16 @@ static int program_opp_freq(int res, int target_level, int current_level)
> ret = clk_set_rate(dpll3_clk,
> l3_opps[target_level].rate * l3_div);
> }
> - if (ret) {
> - unlock_scratchpad_sem();
> - return current_level;
> - }
> +out:
> + if (!ret) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> - omap3_save_scratchpad_contents();
> + omap3_save_scratchpad_contents();
> + *curr_opp = target_level;
> #endif
shouldn't &curr_opp = target_level be done outside of #ifdef CONFIG_PM?
> + }
> unlock_scratchpad_sem();
>
> - *curr_opp = target_level;
> - return target_level;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int program_opp(int res, struct omap_opp *opp, int target_level,
> @@ -289,13 +298,35 @@ static int program_opp(int res, struct omap_opp *opp, int target_level,
> current_level);
> #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_SMARTREFLEX
> else
> - sr_voltagescale_vcbypass(t_opp, c_opp,
> + ret = sr_voltagescale_vcbypass(t_opp, c_opp,
> opp[target_level].vsel,
> opp[current_level].vsel);
> + if (ret) {
> + int ret1 = 0;
> + /*
> + * If something did not work, put me back to old state.
> + * Recover the other guy if at least 1 prev iteration
> + * had run
> + */
> + if (i && raise)
> + ret1 = sr_voltagescale_vcbypass(c_opp, t_opp,
> + opp[current_level].vsel,
> + opp[target_level].vsel);
> + else if (i)
> + ret1 = program_opp_freq(res, current_level,
> + target_level);
> + /*
> + * If I could not reset my old state back.. system
> + * is no longer in a controlled state.. bug me
> + */
> + if (unlikely(ret1))
> + BUG();
> + break;
> + }
> #endif
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return (res == PRCM_VDD1) ? curr_vdd1_opp : curr_vdd2_opp;
> }
>
> int resource_set_opp_level(int res, u32 target_level, int flags)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-04 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <[RFC PATCH] OMAP3:PM: Fix OPP scale logic>
2009-08-04 13:29 ` [RFC][PATCH v2] OMAP3:PM: Fix OPP scale logic Nishanth Menon
2009-08-04 15:10 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A784F6D.1080404@nokia.com \
--to=ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox