From: Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com>
To: ext Kalle Jokiniemi <kalle.jokiniemi@digia.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] OMAP3: PM: Fix workaround implementation for OMAP3 errata (1.142)
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:48:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7BEA58.8060002@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1249633704.6485.284.camel@ubuntu>
ext Kalle Jokiniemi wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:03 +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> ext Kalle Jokiniemi wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 01:14 +0300, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>> Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> As per errata 1.142, on EMU/HS devices, SDRC_POWER should be programmed
>>>>> for automatic self-refresh before transition to OFF mode.
>>>>> In the current implementation this is done in omap3_scratchpad_contents()
>>>>> which is wrong, since this is the value that will be restored while
>>>>> resuming from OFF mode and not while transitioning to it.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch implements the workaround in the correct way as per errata.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com>
>>>> This looks right to me.
>>>>
>>>> Rajendra, Kalle, any comments? since you were the originators of
>>>> the original patch.
>>>>
>>>> Kevin
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c | 16 ++--------------
>>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>>>>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c
>>>>> index a7159a9..0a563c8 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c
>>>>> @@ -272,20 +272,8 @@ void omap3_save_scratchpad_contents(void)
>>>>> (sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_ERR_TYPE) & 0xFFFF);
>>>>> sdrc_block_contents.dll_a_ctrl = sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_DLLA_CTRL);
>>>>> sdrc_block_contents.dll_b_ctrl = 0x0;
>>>>> - /*
>>>>> - * Due to a OMAP3 errata (1.142), on EMU/HS devices SRDC should
>>>>> - * be programed to issue automatic self refresh on timeout
>>>>> - * of AUTO_CNT = 1 prior to any transition to OFF mode.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - if ((omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP)
>>>>> - && (omap_rev() >= OMAP3430_REV_ES3_0))
>>>>> - sdrc_block_contents.power = (sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_POWER) &
>>>>> - ~(SDRC_POWER_AUTOCOUNT_MASK|
>>>>> - SDRC_POWER_CLKCTRL_MASK)) |
>>>>> - (1 << SDRC_POWER_AUTOCOUNT_SHIFT) |
>>>>> - SDRC_SELF_REFRESH_ON_AUTOCOUNT;
>>>>> - else
>>>>> - sdrc_block_contents.power = sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_POWER);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + sdrc_block_contents.power = sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_POWER);
>>> Why do you want to remove the workaround from scratchpad?
>>>
>>> When we wake up from off mode, the boot ROM code writes these settings
>>> as the first sdrc_power settings after wakeup. If that setting does not
>>> include the workaround, we'll have a period of time where sdram is not
>>> being refreshed. This hits especially HS devices that do long secure
>>> context restore in ROM code as well.
>>>
>>>
>> I suppose SDRAM is always refreshed (i.e. auto refresh) when ON. However when we
>> enter OFF mode it should be _self_ refreshed. That is done by the below code
>> before we switch to OFF mode.
>
> The erratum speaks of auto-refresh failing after waking up from CORE off
> mode. I think there is the described workaround in place in sleep34xx.S
> code to kick up the auto refresh, but this still leaves a short gap
> between boot ROM and the sleep code.
>
> Unless the self-refresh mode does not get changed by the scratchpad
> settings?
>
> - Kalle
There are 2 parts in the errata 1.142.
The 1st part is what you are talking about. And it needs to be applied only on
ES3.0 devices.
The 2nd part is valid only for HS devices.
"..it is mandatory on HS device to have the SDRC issuing automatic self-refresh
entries on inactivity periods.."
My patch is only fixing the implementation of the 2nd part without changing the
work around for the 1st part. no?
-roger
>
>> When we wake up from OFF mode (the scratchpad contents are used), we should
>> restore the original register setting that was there before we went to OFF mode
>> and not the self refresh mode setting. Hence the removal of above code.
>>
>> -roger
>>>>>
>>>>> sdrc_block_contents.cs_0 = 0x0;
>>>>> sdrc_block_contents.mcfg_0 = sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_MCFG_0);
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>>> index 14f10bc..eb3c9e5 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>>> @@ -405,15 +405,23 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> - * On EMU/HS devices ROM code restores a SRDC value
>>>>> - * from scratchpad which has automatic self refresh on timeout
>>>>> - * of AUTO_CNT = 1 enabled. This takes care of errata 1.142.
>>>>> - * Hence store/restore the SDRC_POWER register here.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> + * Due to a OMAP3 errata (1.142), on EMU/HS devices SRDC should
>>>>> + * be programed to issue automatic self refresh on timeout
>>>>> + * of AUTO_CNT = 1 prior to any transition to OFF mode.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +
>>>>> if (omap_rev() >= OMAP3430_REV_ES3_0 &&
>>>>> omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP &&
>>>>> - core_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
>>>>> + core_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
>>>>> +
>>>>> sdrc_pwr = sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_POWER);
>>>>> + sdrc_write_reg((sdrc_pwr &
>>>>> + ~(SDRC_POWER_AUTOCOUNT_MASK|
>>>>> + SDRC_POWER_CLKCTRL_MASK)) |
>>>>> + (1 << SDRC_POWER_AUTOCOUNT_SHIFT) |
>>>>> + SDRC_SELF_REFRESH_ON_AUTOCOUNT,
>>>>> + SDRC_POWER);
>>>>> + }
>>> This part seems ok to me.
>>>
>>> - Kalle
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> if (regset_save_on_suspend)
>>>>> pm_dbg_regset_save(1);
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.6.0.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-07 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-29 13:16 [RFC][PATCH] OMAP3: PM: Fix workaround implementation for OMAP3 errata (1.142) Roger Quadros
2009-08-06 22:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-08-07 6:16 ` Kalle Jokiniemi
2009-08-07 8:03 ` Roger Quadros
2009-08-07 8:28 ` Kalle Jokiniemi
2009-08-07 8:48 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2009-08-07 10:30 ` Kalle Jokiniemi
2009-08-07 10:54 ` Roger Quadros
2009-08-07 11:16 ` Kalle Jokiniemi
2009-08-13 15:31 ` Nayak, Rajendra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A7BEA58.8060002@nokia.com \
--to=ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com \
--cc=kalle.jokiniemi@digia.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox