public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com>
To: ext Kalle Jokiniemi <kalle.jokiniemi@digia.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] OMAP3: PM: Fix workaround	implementation	for	OMAP3 errata (1.142)
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:54:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7C07D4.1040703@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1249641008.6485.332.camel@ubuntu>

ext Kalle Jokiniemi wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:48 +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> ext Kalle Jokiniemi wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:03 +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>> ext Kalle Jokiniemi wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 01:14 +0300, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>>>> Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As per errata 1.142, on EMU/HS devices, SDRC_POWER should be programmed
>>>>>>> for automatic self-refresh before transition to OFF mode.
>>>>>>> In the current implementation this is done in omap3_scratchpad_contents()
>>>>>>> which is wrong, since this is the value that will be restored while
>>>>>>> resuming from OFF mode and not while transitioning to it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch implements the workaround in the correct way as per errata.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com>
>>>>>> This looks right to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rajendra, Kalle, any comments? since you were the originators of
>>>>>> the original patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kevin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c |   16 ++--------------
>>>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c  |   20 ++++++++++++++------
>>>>>>>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c
>>>>>>> index a7159a9..0a563c8 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c
>>>>>>> @@ -272,20 +272,8 @@ void omap3_save_scratchpad_contents(void)
>>>>>>>  			(sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_ERR_TYPE) & 0xFFFF);
>>>>>>>  	sdrc_block_contents.dll_a_ctrl = sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_DLLA_CTRL);
>>>>>>>  	sdrc_block_contents.dll_b_ctrl = 0x0;
>>>>>>> -	/*
>>>>>>> -	 * Due to a OMAP3 errata (1.142), on EMU/HS devices SRDC should
>>>>>>> -	 * be programed to issue automatic self refresh on timeout
>>>>>>> -	 * of AUTO_CNT = 1 prior to any transition to OFF mode.
>>>>>>> -	 */
>>>>>>> -	if ((omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP)
>>>>>>> -			&& (omap_rev() >= OMAP3430_REV_ES3_0))
>>>>>>> -		sdrc_block_contents.power = (sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_POWER) &
>>>>>>> -				~(SDRC_POWER_AUTOCOUNT_MASK|
>>>>>>> -				SDRC_POWER_CLKCTRL_MASK)) |
>>>>>>> -				(1 << SDRC_POWER_AUTOCOUNT_SHIFT) |
>>>>>>> -				SDRC_SELF_REFRESH_ON_AUTOCOUNT;
>>>>>>> -	else
>>>>>>> -		sdrc_block_contents.power = sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_POWER);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +	sdrc_block_contents.power = sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_POWER);
>>>>> Why do you want to remove the workaround from scratchpad?
>>>>>
>>>>> When we wake up from off mode, the boot ROM code writes these settings
>>>>> as the first sdrc_power settings after wakeup. If that setting does not
>>>>> include the workaround, we'll have a period of time where sdram is not
>>>>> being refreshed. This hits especially HS devices that do long secure
>>>>> context restore in ROM code as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I suppose SDRAM is always refreshed (i.e. auto refresh) when ON. However when we 
>>>> enter OFF mode it should be _self_ refreshed. That is done by the below code 
>>>> before we switch to OFF mode.
>>> The erratum speaks of auto-refresh failing after waking up from CORE off
>>> mode. I think there is the described workaround in place in sleep34xx.S
>>> code to kick up the auto refresh, but this still leaves a short gap
>>> between boot ROM and the sleep code.
>>>
>>> Unless the self-refresh mode does not get changed by the scratchpad
>>> settings?
>>>
>>> - Kalle
>> There are 2 parts in the errata 1.142.
>>
>> The 1st part is what you are talking about. And it needs to be applied only on 
>> ES3.0 devices.
>>
>> The 2nd part is valid only for HS devices.
>> "..it is mandatory on HS device to have the SDRC issuing automatic self-refresh
>> entries on inactivity periods.."
>>
>> My patch is only fixing the implementation of the 2nd part without changing the 
>> work around for the 1st part. no?
> 
> The fix for second part is ok. But I have understood that the scratchpad
> change was an additional safeguard against the 1st part. Rajendra, any
> comments? 
> 
> I don't know how fast SDRAM corrupts when not refreshed, but on low OPP
> it takes several msecs to reach public code from boot ROM. So keeping
> SDRAM in self-refresh also in this period, seems sensible to me (even
> though the erratum does not mention a requirement for this).
> 
> - Kalle

If what you are saying is right then this should be done for all OMAPs and not 
only non GP right?

-roger

> 
>> -roger
>>
>>>> When we wake up from OFF mode (the scratchpad contents are used), we should 
>>>> restore the original register setting that was there before we went to OFF mode 
>>>> and not the self refresh mode setting. Hence the removal of above code.
>>>>
>>>> -roger
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  	sdrc_block_contents.cs_0 = 0x0;
>>>>>>>  	sdrc_block_contents.mcfg_0 = sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_MCFG_0);
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>>>>> index 14f10bc..eb3c9e5 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>>>>> @@ -405,15 +405,23 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
>>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  	/*
>>>>>>> -	* On EMU/HS devices ROM code restores a SRDC value
>>>>>>> -	* from scratchpad which has automatic self refresh on timeout
>>>>>>> -	* of AUTO_CNT = 1 enabled. This takes care of errata 1.142.
>>>>>>> -	* Hence store/restore the SDRC_POWER register here.
>>>>>>> -	*/
>>>>>>> +	 * Due to a OMAP3 errata (1.142), on EMU/HS devices SRDC should
>>>>>>> +	 * be programed to issue automatic self refresh on timeout
>>>>>>> +	 * of AUTO_CNT = 1 prior to any transition to OFF mode.
>>>>>>> +	 */
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>  	if (omap_rev() >= OMAP3430_REV_ES3_0 &&
>>>>>>>  	    omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP &&
>>>>>>> -	    core_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
>>>>>>> +	    core_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>  		sdrc_pwr = sdrc_read_reg(SDRC_POWER);
>>>>>>> +		sdrc_write_reg((sdrc_pwr &
>>>>>>> +				~(SDRC_POWER_AUTOCOUNT_MASK|
>>>>>>> +				SDRC_POWER_CLKCTRL_MASK)) |
>>>>>>> +				(1 << SDRC_POWER_AUTOCOUNT_SHIFT) |
>>>>>>> +				SDRC_SELF_REFRESH_ON_AUTOCOUNT,
>>>>>>> +					SDRC_POWER);
>>>>>>> +	}
>>>>> This part seems ok to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Kalle
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  	if (regset_save_on_suspend)
>>>>>>>  		pm_dbg_regset_save(1);
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> 1.6.0.4
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-07 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-29 13:16 [RFC][PATCH] OMAP3: PM: Fix workaround implementation for OMAP3 errata (1.142) Roger Quadros
2009-08-06 22:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-08-07  6:16   ` Kalle Jokiniemi
2009-08-07  8:03     ` Roger Quadros
2009-08-07  8:28       ` Kalle Jokiniemi
2009-08-07  8:48         ` Roger Quadros
2009-08-07 10:30           ` Kalle Jokiniemi
2009-08-07 10:54             ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2009-08-07 11:16               ` Kalle Jokiniemi
2009-08-13 15:31             ` Nayak, Rajendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A7C07D4.1040703@nokia.com \
    --to=ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com \
    --cc=kalle.jokiniemi@digia.com \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox