From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: PM: Ensure MUSB is accessible before we attempt to reset it
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:21:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A834E88.3060502@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ocql14qc.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Thanks for this fix.
>
> I'll consider this another vote for switching to omap_hwmod.
To be honest, I am not too familiar with omap_hwmod. Only what I have
seen here:
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28171/
Anyway, sounds like a good idea. I am not a fan of the current code as
it does appear a little random but I can see that it is necessary.
> In general, musb_pm_init() is a hack until the omap_hwmod suport
> for the OTG module is in place. Using hwmod, this reset stuff will
> be done by hwmod, and all the clocks will be taken care of.
>
> All that to say, for the PM branch, I'd rather see USBOTG module
> implemented in hwmod than to continue to hack a hack.
Agree. Although I am concerned that this could cause problems for
someone that chooses to use a boot mode that does not attempt to boot
from USB before booting from their preferred non-volatile memory.
> However, since hwmod doesn't exist in pm-2.6.29, I'm willing to
> carry this fix in pm-2.6.29.
>
> To that end, some comments inlined below...
Ok, I will clean up and then should I then rebase the patch of the
current pm-2.6.29 branch?
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c
>> index 3efa19c..7cfe9bb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c
>> @@ -32,25 +32,51 @@
>> #include <mach/irqs.h>
>> #include <mach/mux.h>
>> #include <mach/usb.h>
>> +#include "cm.h"
>>
>> #define OTG_SYSCONFIG 0x404
>> #define OTG_SYSC_SOFTRESET BIT(1)
>> +#define OTG_SYSSTATUS 0x408
>> +#define OTG_SYSS_RESETDONE BIT(0)
>>
>> static void __init usb_musb_pm_init(void)
>> {
>> - void __iomem *otg_base;
>> + void __iomem *cm_base, *otg_base;
>> + unsigned int cm_iclken_core;
>>
>> if (!cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> return;
>>
>> + cm_base = ioremap(OMAP3430_CM_BASE, SZ_4K);
>> + if (WARN_ON(!cm_base))
>> + return;
>> +
>> otg_base = ioremap(OMAP34XX_HSUSB_OTG_BASE, SZ_4K);
>> - if (WARN_ON(!otg_base))
>> + if (WARN_ON(!otg_base)) {
>> + iounmap(cm_base);
>> return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Ensure the inferface clock for MUSB is enabled */
>> + cm_iclken_core = __raw_readl(OMAP34XX_CM_REGADDR(CORE_MOD,
>> + CM_ICLKEN1));
>> + __raw_writel((cm_iclken_core |
>> + (1 << OMAP3430_EN_HSOTGUSB_SHIFT)),
>> + OMAP34XX_CM_REGADDR(CORE_MOD, CM_ICLKEN1));
>
> Any reason to no use the clock API for this?
>
> otg_clk = clk_get(dev, "ick")
> clk_enable(otg_clk);
No, I just could not see any easy way to do this as I had assumed I
needed to use the musb_device structure which may not be defined
depending on the kernel config. Hence, my crude hack. However, I agree
that this would be preferred.
> You'll have to create a dummy 'struct device' and pass it to clk_get()
> for this to work right.
>
> See commit 917fa280e5e99edcae44a34feab295a59922d16c in linux-omap
> master for how I did this for MMC (but also note that this is now
> removed in the current PM branch because hwmod takes care of this.)
Thanks, this should work!
Cheers
Jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-12 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-10 21:15 [PATCH] OMAP3: PM: Ensure MUSB is accessible before we attempt to reset it Jon Hunter
2009-08-11 12:41 ` Gadiyar, Anand
2009-08-12 14:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-08-12 23:21 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2009-08-12 23:28 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A834E88.3060502@ti.com \
--to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox