From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: several OMAP newbie questions Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:07:11 +0300 Message-ID: <4AACEE7F.5030501@compulab.co.il> References: <4A9CF8AC.2010408@compulab.co.il> <87hbvaaiiv.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from compulab.co.il ([67.18.134.219]:33256 "EHLO compulab.co.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752418AbZIMNHM (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:07:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87hbvaaiiv.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: Cliff Brake , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi Kevin, Kevin Hilman wrote: > There is lots of agreement around the various shortcomings of the > current mux framework for OMAP. All that's missing is someone to step > up and do the work. :/ > > I started a new wiki topic at elinux.org for linux-omap wishlist items: > > http://elinux.org/OMAP_wishlist > > here I created a pin-mux section where we could start to keep track of > the important features needed in a new mux framework. Adding pointers > summaries to some other platforms might be useful here as well. If you'd like to I can add a brief description of what PXA does. > This will help us get a start so when someone is ready to step up and > do the work, we'll have a starting point. > Kevin > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.