From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Janosch Machowinski Subject: Re: stable kernel version Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:00:29 +0200 Message-ID: <4AD62DDD.6090403@tzi.de> References: <4AD58D69.2080303@tzi.de> <20091014172656.GJ12700@atomide.com> <4AD60CEE.8000204@tzi.de> <20091014193324.GK12700@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.201.18]:47022 "EHLO informatik.uni-bremen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932592AbZJNUBb (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:01:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20091014193324.GK12700@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Tony Lindgren schrieb: >> Hi Tony, >> >> the 2.6.30 head booted fine until the point where it >> waited for the SD-Card to get ready. There it just hung >> forever. >> > > Hmm, 2.6.30 may not have all the core stuff in it yet. > > >> the 2.6.31 head crashed instantly after the uncompression >> of the kernel image. >> > > There are few patches still pending to get to mainline > via other mailing lists, you can see them in omap-testing > branch. > > >> I will try out the 2.6.31 mainline kernel tommorw. >> > > OK, also I just pushed updated omap-debug branch that > I forgot to rebase on top of current linux-omap master > branch (Thanks Paul for letting me know!). > > Tony > > I just realized, that I made myself not clear about the kernels I tested. I used omap-2.6.30 head and omap-2.6.31 head. Janosch