public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: John Rigby <jcrigby@gmail.com>, Madhusudhan <madhu.cr@ti.com>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com>,
	"Thompson, Bernard" <bthompson@ti.com>
Subject: Re: MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ for omap 3430
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:08:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADA082E.8060304@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b73d43f0910170812of187c94oc4931cd3330b88c0@mail.gmail.com>


Does anybody have access to omap_hsmmc driver of "the SDK 1.0.2 
kernel"? Or has any hint where to get it from?

https://community.ti.com/forums/p/6290/23867.aspx#23873

talks about

"For the SDIO solution, the SDK 1.0.2 kernel supports SDIO out of the 
box ..."

Thanks

Dirk

John Rigby wrote:
> First, answers to your questions:
> 
> The CIRQ bit in the STAT register is on if the CIRQ is enabled in the
> IE register and clear when disabled in the IE.  That is to say that
> the IE register appears to be working.
> 
> Yes the card has no pending irqs.
> 
> IBG is set really early when the card is discovered.  First interrupt
> does not occur until much later when the libertas driver asks for
> interrupts.
> 
> The lines have pull ups.
> 
> Now a thought.
> 
> Do we  need to set DDIR in the CMD reg for CIRQ to work correctly?
> Right now it is set at the beginning of data read commands, cleared on
> data write commands and otherwise untouched.  If DDIR is used
> unconditionally to set the direction of the data line buffers then it
> would make sense that we need to set the direction to in in order to
> monitor the DAT1 line.  I will try this Monday when I get back to
> work.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> John Rigby wrote:
>>> It appears to never get cleared in the status register.
>> In the OMAP status register, correct? (just to get the correct
>> understanding)
>>
>>> I added some printks to sdio_irq.c to print the pending interrupts in
>>> the SDIO_CCCR_INTx register for the card and there are no pending
>>> interrupts so I don't think it is a card driver or card issue.
>> Ok, in other words, this does mean that the card has no interrupt asserted
>> any more (i.e. it is acknowledged by upper layers, e.g. libertas driver),
>> but OMAP thinks there is still an interrupt. Right? This would mean it is an
>> OMAP/omap_hsmmc.c issue. Right?
>>
>>> It would be funny if the TRM was wrong and the CIRQ bit is really
>>> cleared by writing 1 to it.  I'll try that.
>> Have you checked if
>>
>> - IBG (and 4 bit mode) is correctly set before the first interrupt is fired
>> (just to make sure that we don't have a function calling order issue)?
>>
>> - your HW design has a pull up on DAT1 line (as required by the SD physical
>> spec)?
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Madhusudhan <madhu.cr@ti.com> wrote:
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.behme@googlemail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 2:28 PM
>>>>> To: Madhusudhan Chikkature
>>>>> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; John Rigby; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
>>>>> Steve Sakoman
>>>>> Subject: Re: MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ for omap 3430
>>>>>
>>>>> Madhusudhan Chikkature wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Dirk,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am inlining the patch so that it helps review.
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> @@ -1165,8 +1178,15 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_set_ios(struct mm
>>>>>>            break;
>>>>>>    case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4:
>>>>>>            OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, CON, con & ~DW8);
>>>>>> -           OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, HCTL,
>>>>>> -                   OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, HCTL) | FOUR_BIT);
>>>>>> +           if (mmc_card_sdio(host->mmc->card)) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wish it could be moved to "enable_sdio_irq" so that we can avoid
>>>>> inclusion of
>>>>>> card.h and checking the type of card in the host controller driver.
>>>>> Yes, this would be the real clean way. But ...
>>>>>
>>>>>> But the
>>>>>> dependancy on 4-bit seems to be a problem here.
>>>>> ... most probably we have to find a workaround until (if ever?) above
>>>>> clean implementation is available.
>>>>>
>>>>> What we need is after SDIO mode and bus width is known, and before the
>>>>> first interrupt comes, to set IBG.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On the problems being discussed on testing is the interrupt source
>>>>> geting
>>>>>> cleared at the SDIO card level upon genaration of the CIRQ? If not it
>>>>> remains
>>>>>> asserted.
>>>>> Yes, this seems to be exactly the problem John reports in his follow
>>>>> up mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any hint how to clear SDIO interrupt?
>>>>>
>>>> On the controller side I guess it is cleared when you pass "disable" in
>>>> the
>>>> enable_sdio_irq" fn. This happens when you call mmc_signal_sdio_irq.
>>>>
>>>> I am not too sure about how it gets disabled from the card side. I see
>>>> that
>>>> SDIO core has a function "sdio_release_irq" which is used by the sdio
>>>> uart
>>>> driver. The usage of this could give a clue.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Madhu
>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Dirk
>>>>>
>>>>>> +                   OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, HCTL,
>>>>>> +                                    OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, HCTL)
>>>>>> +                                    | IBG | FOUR_BIT);
>>>>>> +           } else {
>>>>>> +                   OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, HCTL,
>>>>>> +                                    OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, HCTL)
>>>>>> +                                    | FOUR_BIT);
>>>>>> +           }
>>>>>>            break;
>>>>>>    case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_1:
>>>>>>            OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, CON, con & ~DW8);
>>>>>> @@ -1512,6 +1532,24 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_disable_fclk(struc
>>>>>>    return 0;
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static void omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int
>>>>> enable)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +   struct omap_hsmmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>>>>>> +   u32 ie, ise;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +   ise = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, ISE);
>>>>>> +   ie  = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, IE);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +   if (enable) {
>>>>>> +           OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, ise | CIRQ_ENABLE);
>>>>>> +           OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE,  ie  | CIRQ_ENABLE);
>>>>>> +   } else {
>>>>>> +           OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, ise & ~CIRQ_ENABLE);
>>>>>> +           OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE,  ie  & ~CIRQ_ENABLE);
>>>>>> +   }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>  static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hsmmc_ops = {
>>>>>>    .enable = omap_hsmmc_enable_fclk,
>>>>>>    .disable = omap_hsmmc_disable_fclk,
>>>>>> @@ -1519,7 +1557,7 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hs
>>>>>>    .set_ios = omap_hsmmc_set_ios,
>>>>>>    .get_cd = omap_hsmmc_get_cd,
>>>>>>    .get_ro = omap_hsmmc_get_ro,
>>>>>> -   /* NYET -- enable_sdio_irq */
>>>>>> +   .enable_sdio_irq = omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq,
>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hsmmc_ps_ops = {
>>>>>> @@ -1529,7 +1567,7 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hs
>>>>>>    .set_ios = omap_hsmmc_set_ios,
>>>>>>    .get_cd = omap_hsmmc_get_cd,
>>>>>>    .get_ro = omap_hsmmc_get_ro,
>>>>>> -   /* NYET -- enable_sdio_irq */
>>>>>> +   .enable_sdio_irq = omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq,
>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>>>>>> @@ -1734,7 +1772,7 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struc
>>>>>>    mmc->max_seg_size = mmc->max_req_size;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED |
>>>>>> -                MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY;
>>>>>> +                MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY | MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 8)
>>>>>>            mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John Rigby wrote:
>>>>>>>> I have seen several discussions about lack of sdio irq support in the
>>>>>>>> hsmmc driver but no patches.  Has anyone on this list implemented
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> and/or can anyone point me to patches?
>>>>>>> What a coincidence ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm currently working on this. See attachment what I currently have.
>>>>>>> It is compile tested only against recent omap linux head. I don't have
>>>>>>> a board using SDIO at the moment, so no real testing possible :(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some background, maybe it helps people to step in:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gumstix OMAP3 based Overo air board connects Marvell 88W8686 wifi by
>>>>>>> MMC port 2 in 4 bit configuration [1]. The wifi performance is quite
>>>>>>> bad (~100kB/s). There is some rumor that this might be SDIO irq
>>>>>>> related [2]. There was an attempt to fix this [3] already, but this
>>>>>>> doesn't work [4]. Having this, I started to look into it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I used [3], the TI Davinci driver [5] (supporting SDIO irq), the SDIO
>>>>>>> Simplified Specification [6] and the OMAP35x TRM [7] as starting
>>>>> points.
>>>>>>> Unfortunately, the Davinci MMC registers and irqs are different
>>>>>>> (Davinci has a dedicated SDIO irq). But combining [3] and [5] helps to
>>>>>>> get an idea what has to be done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think the main issues of [3] were that it doesn't enable IBG for 4
>>>>>>> bit mode ([6] chapter 8.1.2) and that mmc_omap_irq() doesn't reset the
>>>>>>> irq bits.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Topics I still open:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Is it always necessary to deal with IE _and_ ISE register? I'm not
>>>>>>> totally clear what the difference between these two registers are ;)
>>>>>>> And in which order they have to be set.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Davinci driver [5] in line 1115 checks for data line to call
>>>>>>> mmc_signal_sdio_irq() for irq enable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Davinci driver deals with SDIO in xfer_done() (line 873)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Davinci driver sets block size to 64 if SDIO in line 701
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It would be quite nice if anybody likes to comment on attachment and
>>>>>>> help testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Many thanks and best regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dirk
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] http://gumstix.net/wiki/index.php?title=Overo_Wifi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [2] http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard/msg/14e822778c5eeb56
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [3] http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard/msg/d0eb69f4c20673be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [4] http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard/msg/5cdfe2a319531937
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [5]
>>>>>>> http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-
>>>>>
>>>>> davinci.git;a=blob;f=drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c;h=1bf0587250614c6d8abf
>>>>> e02028b96e0e47148ac8;hb=HEAD
>>>>>>> [6] http://www.sdcard.org/developers/tech/sdio/sd_bluetooth_spec/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [7] http://focus.ti.com/lit/ug/spruf98c/spruf98c.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-17 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-15 20:30 MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ for omap 3430 John Rigby
2009-10-16  7:16 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-16 13:43   ` John Rigby
2009-10-16 15:02     ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-16 15:59       ` John Rigby
2009-10-16 16:06         ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-16 18:51           ` John Rigby
2009-10-16 19:55             ` Dirk Behme
     [not found]               ` <4b73d43f0910161337k24908c7bjf5d84a90efb27bef@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-16 20:39                 ` John Rigby
2009-10-16 17:43   ` Madhusudhan Chikkature
2009-10-16 19:28     ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-16 21:14       ` Madhusudhan
2009-10-16 21:26         ` John Rigby
2009-10-17  6:30           ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-17 15:12             ` John Rigby
2009-10-17 17:36               ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-17 18:08               ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2009-10-18 16:44           ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-18 23:12             ` Woodruff, Richard
2009-10-19  0:17               ` John Rigby
     [not found]                 ` <4b73d43f0910181724q11d40851wb2aed801d7ae85f6@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-19 17:27                   ` Madhusudhan
     [not found]                   ` <005101ca50e1$11ef2770$544ff780@am.dhcp.ti.com>
2009-10-19 18:10                     ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-19 18:16                     ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-20 22:47                       ` Madhusudhan
2009-10-20 22:59                         ` John Rigby
2009-10-21 17:46                           ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-21 17:44                         ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-20  1:13                     ` John Rigby
2009-10-20  2:53                       ` Woodruff, Richard
     [not found]                     ` <4b73d43f0910191439o30fd1de6odab8ccd5e5430760@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-20  4:47                       ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-20 18:45                         ` John Rigby
2009-10-20 18:55                           ` Steve Sakoman
2009-10-19 14:52               ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-19 15:29                 ` Woodruff, Richard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ADA082E.8060304@googlemail.com \
    --to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
    --cc=bthompson@ti.com \
    --cc=jcrigby@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madhu.cr@ti.com \
    --cc=sakoman@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox