From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: Madhusudhan <madhu.cr@ti.com>,
'Phaneendra Kumar Alapati' <phani@embwise.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP35xx: Added SDIO IRQ support
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:47:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE89FEC.9000309@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001ca57e8$e4108ec0$544ff780@am.dhcp.ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7336 bytes --]
Madhusudhan wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
>> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Phaneendra Kumar Alapati
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 8:19 AM
>> To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: [PATCH] OMAP35xx: Added SDIO IRQ support
>>
>> This patch adds SDIO IRQ support for omap hsmmc driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Phaneendra Kumar Alapati <phani@embwise.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 62 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> index 1cf9cfb..a540626 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> @@ -92,6 +92,10 @@
>> #define DUAL_VOLT_OCR_BIT 7
>> #define SRC (1 << 25)
>> #define SRD (1 << 26)
>> +#define OMAP_HSMMC_CARD_INT BIT(8)
>> +#define SDIO_INT_EN BIT(8)
> Why multiple defines of the same? One of them should be enough.
What I think meant here is
#define CIRQ (1 << 8)
#define CIRQ_ENABLE (1 << 8)
One is for the status register, the other is for the interrupt enable
registers. To be compatible with the TRM, I would use both in this way.
>> +#define CTPL BIT(11)
>> +#define CLKEXTFREE BIT(16)
> Can we define them in the same way as other defines to maintain uniformity?
Yes, ack.
>> /*
>> * FIXME: Most likely all the data using these _DEVID defines should come
>> @@ -149,6 +153,7 @@ struct mmc_omap_host {
>> int slot_id;
>> int dbclk_enabled;
>> int response_busy;
>> + int sdio_int;
>
> What purpose does this serve? IMHO, this is not needed.
Hmm. This is set to != 0 in omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq() when IRQs are
enabled. Then in mmc_omap_start_command() these interrupts are enabled
again if sdio_int is != 0. Yes, looks unneeded, indeed. But maybe
there is some trick ;)
>> struct omap_mmc_platform_data *pdata;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -240,8 +245,13 @@ mmc_omap_start_command(struct mmc_omap_host
>> *host, struct mmc_command *cmd,
Patch is line wrapped by mailer.
>> * Clear status bits and enable interrupts
>> */
>> OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, STAT, STAT_CLEAR);
>> - OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, INT_EN_MASK);
>> - OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE, INT_EN_MASK);
>> + if (host->sdio_int) {
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, (INT_EN_MASK |
>> SDIO_INT_EN));
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE, (INT_EN_MASK |
> SDIO_INT_EN));
> Why? It is being taken care in "enable_sdio_irq".
Yes, why?
>> + } else {
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, INT_EN_MASK);
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE, INT_EN_MASK);
>> + }
>>
>> host->response_busy = 0;
>> if (cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_PRESENT) {
>> @@ -430,17 +440,27 @@ static irqreturn_t mmc_omap_irq(int irq, void
>> *dev_id)
>> struct mmc_data *data;
>> int end_cmd = 0, end_trans = 0, status;
>>
>> + data = host->data;
>> + status = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, STAT);
>> + dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "IRQ Status is %x\n", status);
> Why are these moved up?
Yes, why? Why not move the block below down instead?
>> +
>> + if (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>> + if (status & OMAP_HSMMC_CARD_INT) {
>> + dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
>> + " SDIO CARD interrupt status %x\n",
>> + status);
>> + mmc_signal_sdio_irq(host->mmc);
>> + }
>> + }
- It makes no sense to print status in dev_dbg here again, as it is
already printed some lines above. Something like
dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "SDIO interrupt\n");
would be sufficient here.
- Why isn't IRQ acknowledged here? I.e. why not doing something like
OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE, OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, IE) &
~(CIRQ_ENABLE));
here?
- No return IRQ_HANDLED; here? Mmm, maybe this makes sense.
>> if (host->mrq == NULL) {
>> OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, STAT,
>> - OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, STAT));
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, STAT));
> This just adds a tab space. Not needed.
Ack.
>> /* Flush posted write */
>> OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, STAT);
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>>
>> - data = host->data;
>> - status = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, STAT);
>> - dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "IRQ Status is %x\n", status);
> Check my comment above.
Yes, from theory it looks better to move the new code below this, instead.
>> if (status & ERR) {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_DEBUG
>> @@ -932,6 +952,29 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>> return pdata->slots[0].get_ro(host->dev, 0);
>> }
>>
>> +static void omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enable)
>> +{
>> + struct mmc_omap_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>> +
>> + host->sdio_int = enable;
>> + if (enable) {
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE,
>> + (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, ISE) |
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_CARD_INT));
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE,
>> + (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, IE) |
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_CARD_INT));
>> + } else {
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE,
>> + (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, IE) &
>> + (~OMAP_HSMMC_CARD_INT)));
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE,
>> + (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, ISE) &
>> + (~OMAP_HSMMC_CARD_INT)));
>> + }
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> static void omap_hsmmc_init(struct mmc_omap_host *host)
>> {
>> u32 hctl, capa, value;
>> @@ -964,7 +1007,7 @@ static struct mmc_host_ops mmc_omap_ops = {
>> .set_ios = omap_mmc_set_ios,
>> .get_cd = omap_hsmmc_get_cd,
>> .get_ro = omap_hsmmc_get_ro,
>> - /* NYET -- enable_sdio_irq */
>> + .enable_sdio_irq = omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq,
>> };
>>
>> static int __init omap_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> @@ -1011,6 +1054,7 @@ static int __init omap_mmc_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
Greetings from the mailer again.
>> host->irq = irq;
>> host->id = pdev->id;
>> host->slot_id = 0;
>> + host->sdio_int = 0;
> Not needed.
>
>> host->mapbase = res->start;
>> host->base = ioremap(host->mapbase, SZ_4K);
>>
>> @@ -1080,6 +1124,10 @@ static int __init omap_mmc_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> else if (pdata->slots[host->slot_id].wires >= 4)
>> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
>>
>> + mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, CON,
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, CON) | (CTPL |
> CLKEXTFREE));
> How about moving this to "enable_sdio_irq" so that these are done for SDIO
> alone? Also can be disabled in the same fn.
Ack. But I think that mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ has to stay here.
Else "enable_sdio_irq" will never be called (?)
All in all, I wonder why IBG bit isn't used in this patch. Is this
tested with 1 or 4 bit (wire) SDIO?
Just for reference the slightly modified version of this patch for
testing in attachment (based on pure theory ;) ). I will come back
with testing results.
Best regards
Dirk
> Regards,
> Madhusudhan
>> +
>> omap_hsmmc_init(host);
>>
>> /* Select DMA lines */
>> --
>> 1.6.0.4
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
[-- Attachment #2: omap_hsmmc_sdio_irq_2_6_31_phaneendra_patch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3412 bytes --]
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP35xx: Added SDIO IRQ support
From: Phaneendra Kumar Alapati <phani@embwise.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:48:38 +0530
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
This patch adds SDIO IRQ support for omap hsmmc driver.
Signed-off-by: Phaneendra Kumar Alapati <phani@embwise.com>
---
Revised version of
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=125673594321210&w=2
based on comments and theory. Please test.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-beagle/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-beagle.orig/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
+++ linux-beagle/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
@@ -92,6 +92,10 @@
#define DUAL_VOLT_OCR_BIT 7
#define SRC (1 << 25)
#define SRD (1 << 26)
+#define CIRQ (1 << 8)
+#define CIRQ_ENABLE (1 << 8)
+#define CTPL (1 << 11)
+#define CLKEXTFREE (1 << 16)
/*
* FIXME: Most likely all the data using these _DEVID defines should come
@@ -430,6 +434,15 @@ static irqreturn_t mmc_omap_irq(int irq,
struct mmc_data *data;
int end_cmd = 0, end_trans = 0, status;
+ data = host->data;
+ status = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, STAT);
+ dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "IRQ Status is %x\n", status);
+
+ if ((status & CIRQ) && (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ)) {
+ dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "SDIO interrupt\n");
+ mmc_signal_sdio_irq(host->mmc);
+ }
+
if (host->mrq == NULL) {
OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, STAT,
OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, STAT));
@@ -438,9 +451,6 @@ static irqreturn_t mmc_omap_irq(int irq,
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
- data = host->data;
- status = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, STAT);
- dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "IRQ Status is %x\n", status);
if (status & ERR) {
#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_DEBUG
@@ -932,6 +942,34 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_get_ro(struct mmc_
return pdata->slots[0].get_ro(host->dev, 0);
}
+static void omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enable)
+{
+ struct mmc_omap_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
+
+ if (enable) {
+ OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, CON,
+ OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, CON) |
+ CTPL | CLKEXTFREE);
+ OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE,
+ (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, ISE) |
+ CIRQ_ENABLE));
+ OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE,
+ (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, IE) |
+ CIRQ_ENABLE));
+ } else {
+ OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE,
+ (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, IE) &
+ (~CIRQ_ENABLE)));
+ OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE,
+ (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, ISE) &
+ (~CIRQ_ENABLE)));
+ OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, CON,
+ OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, CON) &
+ ~(CTPL | CLKEXTFREE));
+ }
+
+}
+
static void omap_hsmmc_init(struct mmc_omap_host *host)
{
u32 hctl, capa, value;
@@ -964,7 +1002,7 @@ static struct mmc_host_ops mmc_omap_ops
.set_ios = omap_mmc_set_ios,
.get_cd = omap_hsmmc_get_cd,
.get_ro = omap_hsmmc_get_ro,
- /* NYET -- enable_sdio_irq */
+ .enable_sdio_irq = omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq,
};
static int __init omap_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -1080,6 +1118,8 @@ static int __init omap_mmc_probe(struct
else if (pdata->slots[host->slot_id].wires >= 4)
mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
+ mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
+
omap_hsmmc_init(host);
/* Select DMA lines */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-28 13:18 [PATCH] OMAP35xx: Added SDIO IRQ support Phaneendra Kumar Alapati
2009-10-28 16:08 ` Madhusudhan
2009-10-28 19:47 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2009-10-28 20:52 ` Madhusudhan
2009-10-29 9:27 ` Phaneendra Kumar Alapati
2009-10-29 21:08 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-29 7:00 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-29 14:35 ` Phaneendra Kumar Alapati
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE89FEC.9000309@googlemail.com \
--to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madhu.cr@ti.com \
--cc=phani@embwise.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox