public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: "Pandita, Vikram" <vikram.pandita@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vikram Pandita <vikram.pandtia@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] omap: zoom2: split baord file for reuse
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:17:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF0ABF5.2030700@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257283215-6448-4-git-send-email-vikram.pandita@ti.com>


Pandita, Vikram had written, on 11/03/2009 03:20 PM, the following:
Please fix subject typo:
[PATCH 3/8] omap: zoom2: split baord file for reuse
				^^^^
				board
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.c
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..c799eca
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.c
generic -> zoom Vs LDP.. Vs Zoom2 Vs Zoom3 naming conventions.. are we 
saying we dont care about LDP anymore? all zooms are zoom2 or zoom3?

[...]
> +
> +//static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data zoom_gpio_data = {
> +//     .gpio_base              = OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES,
> +//     .irq_base               = TWL4030_GPIO_IRQ_BASE,
> +//     .irq_end                = TWL4030_GPIO_IRQ_END,
> +//     .pulldowns              = BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2) | BIT(3)
> +//                             | BIT(4) | BIT(5)
> +//                             | BIT(8) | BIT(9) | BIT(10) | BIT(11)
> +//                             | BIT(12) | BIT(13) | BIT(14) | BIT(15)
> +//                             | BIT(16) | BIT(17) ,
> +//     .setup                  = zoom_twlgpio_setup,
> +//};
NAK to //

> +static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data zoom_gpio_data = {
> +       .gpio_base      = OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES,
> +       .irq_base       = TWL4030_GPIO_IRQ_BASE,
> +       .irq_end        = TWL4030_GPIO_IRQ_END,
> +       .setup          = zoom_twl_gpio_setup,
> +};
> +
> +static struct twl4030_usb_data zoom_usb_data = {
> +       .usb_mode               = T2_USB_MODE_ULPI,
> +};
> +
> +/* TODO: enable T2 scripts */
> +#if 0
NAK to #if 0 - introduce seperately if not operational.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom2.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom2.c
> old mode 100644
> new mode 100755
> index 4ad9b94..abcc1ae
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom2.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom2.c
> @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
>  /*
>   * Copyright (C) 2009 Texas Instruments Inc.
> - * Mikkel Christensen <mlc@ti.com>
>   *
> - * Modified from mach-omap2/board-ldp.c
[Should we loose the history?]
[...]
> -static void __init omap_zoom2_init_irq(void)
> +static void __init omap_zoom_init_irq(void)
Question on naming.. as raised above.
[...]

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-03 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-03 21:20 [PATCH 0/8] RFC: introduce 3630 boards Vikram Pandita
2009-11-03 21:20 ` [PATCH 1/8] omap: 3630: update is_chip variable Vikram Pandita
2009-11-03 21:20   ` [PATCH 2/8] omap: DEBUG_LL: allow no omap uart configuration Vikram Pandita
2009-11-03 21:20     ` [PATCH 3/8] omap: zoom2: split baord file for reuse Vikram Pandita
2009-11-03 21:20       ` [PATCH 4/8] omap: zoom2: update defconfig Vikram Pandita
2009-11-03 21:20         ` [PATCH 5/8] omap: zoom3: introduce zoom3 board support Vikram Pandita
2009-11-03 21:20           ` [PATCH 6/8] omap: zoom3: defconfig creation Vikram Pandita
2009-11-03 21:20             ` [PATCH 7/8] omap: 3630sdp: introduce 3630 sdp board support Vikram Pandita
2009-11-03 21:20               ` [PATCH 8/8] omap: 3630sdp: defconfig creation Vikram Pandita
2009-11-03 22:31               ` [PATCH 7/8] omap: 3630sdp: introduce 3630 sdp board support Nishanth Menon
2009-11-03 22:28           ` [PATCH 5/8] omap: zoom3: introduce zoom3 " Nishanth Menon
2009-11-04  7:09         ` [PATCH 4/8] omap: zoom2: update defconfig G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2009-11-03 22:17       ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2009-11-03 22:09     ` [PATCH 2/8] omap: DEBUG_LL: allow no omap uart configuration Nishanth Menon
2009-11-03 21:23 ` [PATCH 0/8] RFC: introduce 3630 boards Pandita, Vikram
2009-11-03 21:26   ` Pandita, Vikram

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF0ABF5.2030700@ti.com \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vikram.pandita@ti.com \
    --cc=vikram.pandtia@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox