From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Romit Dasgupta Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10 V5] omap3: pm: introduce support for 3630 OPPs Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:56:37 +0530 Message-ID: <4B2B58DD.6020901@ti.com> References: <[PATCH 02/10 V4] omap3: pm: introduce opp accessor functions> <1260594031-17268-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <87pr6eadx3.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <873a3aa6lt.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <4B29A401.1050001@ti.com> <87tyvp60p6.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:55630 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751966AbZLRK0p (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:26:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tyvp60p6.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: "Menon, Nishanth" , linux-omap >>> [...] >>> >>> >>>> To facilitate the ongoing discussions on OPP rework, and to have a >>>> common base, this series is available as a branch in my linux-omap-pm >>>> repo[1]. >>>> > > Yes, I'm in the process cleaning that up. > > Once I get some of that cleanup done, I plan to rebase your OPP V5 and > include it in the PM branch. > I tried the latest HEAD on pm-wip-opp. Looks like the cpufreq tables are not initialized because are not initializing {mpu|dsp|l3}_opps. Looks like the comment on the latest commit is to use OPP APIs directly. Is there any patch currently on that direction? Otherwise in the pm-wip-opp branch cpufreq is broken. Thanks, -Romit