From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francisco Alecrim Subject: Re: problem with n810 boot up Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:46:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4B43F983.5050200@gmail.com> References: <200912290152.16357.luke@dashjr.org> <4B43CA48.3070009@gmail.com> <201001051747.02221.luke@dashjr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f188.google.com ([209.85.210.188]:33082 "EHLO mail-yx0-f188.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752711Ab0AFCqn (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 21:46:43 -0500 Received: by yxe26 with SMTP id 26so16288764yxe.4 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:46:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201001051747.02221.luke@dashjr.org> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Luke-Jr Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" , Kalle Valo Hi Luke, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Tuesday 05 January 2010 05:24:56 pm Francisco Alecrim wrote: >> Luke-Jr wrote: >>> Tested on Nokia N810 in Linux-OMAP tree. Mainline is not bootable yet. >> I'm with some problems to boot-up latest l-o(commit >> abb74381235a05f15a3b07e9e3831034942c67fb) with n810. The error message >> can be found below and full boot output in the end of email. >> >> dsme: No correct bootreason found, entering the malfunction state > > That's DSME, part of Maemo userland. You can possibly write a LD_PRELOAD > workaround if you want to run it anyway... I tried but it doesn't work. I included a line to print the /proc/bootreason value and there is no bootreason. :P cat: /proc/bootreason: No such file or directory I guess that's the problem. > >> What rootfs do you use? Did you change initfs? > > Gentoo. I modified my initfs to chainload its init if a new kernel is running. I don't know how to do it. Could you send me yours? > > Unfortunately, I have come to the realisation that moving forward with the > Linux port to N8x0 would take me more time than simply spending the same time > doing paid work and buying a N900* or Pandora instead. So short some other > reimbursement for porting Linux to N8x0 (like maybe a promise of BME sources > or a N900 after the rest is done to finish the job), I'm probably not going to > spend any more time on it. :( Maybe, you're right. Or they can produce something using a SoC cheaper than OMAP3. > > Luke > > * N900 is supposedly mostly mainlined already, and supposedly Nokia will > actually finish the job with unlike N8x0; it also has nicer hardware, even if > you just ignore the cellular capabilities Thank you! :) Alecrim