public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hiroshi Doyu <Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com>,
	Ameya Palande <ameya.palande@nokia.com>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@nokia.com>,
	"Guzman Lugo, Fernando" <x0095840@ti.com>,
	"Ramos Falcon, Ernesto" <ernesto@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] DSPBRIDGE: Use dspbridge to initialize platform data
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:05:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4781F5.9060203@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27F9C60D11D683428E133F85D2BB4A53042DC95329@dlee03.ent.ti.com>

Ramirez Luna, Omar had written, on 01/08/2010 11:58 AM, the following:
>> From: Menon, Nishanth
>>
>> Ramirez Luna, Omar had written, on 01/08/2010 10:48 AM, the following:
>>>> From: Menon, Nishanth
>>>>
>>>> Ramirez Luna, Omar had written, on 01/07/2010 07:00 PM, the following:
>>>>> Include dspbridge compilation whenever bridge driver is selected to
>>>>> be compiled, either as a module or part of the kernel. This will
>>>>> initialize platform data specific PM functions.
>>>> ?? are you intending to state that dspbridge.c can now not be a module?
>>> Yes, if bridge is selected it will include dspbridge as part of the kernel, leaving bridgedriver to
>> be installed depending on selected option (module or built in)
>>>> can you elaborate more as to why?
>>> Lately EXPORT_SYMBOL has been removed from pm functions, bridge depends on those symbols and now
>> that they can't be resolved at runtime (or insmod time), then dspbridge driver needs to be compiled
>> as part of the kernel to resolve them on its platform data structure, otherwise linking will break.
>>
>> might be good to know what these functions are and why they need to be
>> exported. we could see how the community thinks about exporting those
>> APIs. further, I thought your branch was based on l-o and not l-o pm. am
>> I wrong?
> 
> Branch is based on l-o, but I'm trying to keep the less differences between l-o-pm version...
 > as of now since DVFS doesn't exists on l-o, this problem is not 
shown, but bridge version based on l-o-pm has it.
alright, so please keep the patch for dspbridge-pm or equivalent branch 
that you maintain :).

> 
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile |    4 +++-
>>>>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
>>>>> index d1cf986..0881470 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
>>>>> @@ -75,7 +75,9 @@ obj-y					+= $(i2c-omap-m) $(i2c-omap-y)
>>>>>  # Debobs
>>>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP3_DEBOBS)	+= debobs.o
>>>> ?? I dont find this in l-o master/2.6.32.. something I am missing?
>> You never answered this.is your patch based on PM branch?
> 
> Sorry, yes this version of the patch is based on PM, must have confused both versions. 
 > I'll resend master/2.6.32 which should change this reference lines...
> 
> Btw why do we have this "debobs" on l-o-pm and not on l-o?
due to patch in pm tree:
OMAP3: Add debug observablity (debobs) Kconfig item
this is adding debug observability signals over ETK lines (which is 
kinda cool ;) ).

[...]

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

      reply	other threads:[~2010-01-08 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-08  1:00 [PATCH 6/8] DSPBRIDGE: Use dspbridge to initialize platform data Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-01-08  2:29 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-01-08 16:48   ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2010-01-08 16:51     ` Nishanth Menon
2010-01-08 17:58       ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2010-01-08 19:05         ` Nishanth Menon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B4781F5.9060203@ti.com \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com \
    --cc=ameya.palande@nokia.com \
    --cc=ernesto@ti.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@nokia.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=omar.ramirez@ti.com \
    --cc=x0095840@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox