RE: [PATCH] omap3: pm: cpufreq: populate l3 opp1 again

Dasgupta, Romit
2010-01-28T13:43:48Z

> >IMHO the best way to unconfuse readers is to remove the entry.
>
> The confusion is due to a mismatch between public TRM/white paper and
> current code, so maybe a simple comment on top of the
> omap34xx_l3_rate_table will be enough.
>
But why do we want to keep an OPP that will never be used?