From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philip Balister Subject: Re: Which ARM toolchain for OMAP35x? Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:47:01 -0800 Message-ID: <4B798895.5030603@balister.org> References: <738b3f7e1002141347y58bc0c57vc5ef060c5050cbb7@mail.gmail.com> <20100215171009.GB21755@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169]:39711 "EHLO starfish.geekisp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755843Ab0BORrI (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:47:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100215171009.GB21755@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On 02/15/2010 09:10 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Peter Barada [100214 13:44]: >> What's a known good toolcahin for linux-omap development? >> >> I'm currently using CodeSroucery 2009q1-203 and wondering if there's a >> better toolchain or if people have had problems using the the >> 2009q1-203 toolchain. > > That seems to work OK, I can't think of any compiler issues with it. Always worth reading this blog for toolchain info: http://hardwarebug.org/2010/01/15/arm-compiler-update/ Philip