From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Omar Ramirez Luna Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH 1/5] omap2/3/4: mailbox: remove compiler warning Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:05:50 -0600 Message-ID: <4B831BDE.3070703@ti.com> References: <2C1563023E232C49B9F505633D57C2DA2640F2C540@dlee04.ent.ti.com> <4B8319D6.8080909@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:33571 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751115Ab0BWAFx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:05:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B8319D6.8080909@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Anna, Suman" Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Tony Lindgren , "Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com" , "Shilimkar, Santosh" On 2/22/2010 5:57 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote: > > why not moving omap_mbox_unregister to the block containing the ifdefs? > at least you won't be adding an ifdef and if(cpu_xx) > i take this back... both statements are needed because of previous registration. - omar