public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: "me@felipebalbi.com" <me@felipebalbi.com>,
	Linux-Omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"K, Ambresh" <ambresh@ti.com>,
	"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@nokia.com>,
	Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com>,
	"Premi, Sanjeev" <premi@ti.com>,
	Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>,
	"Gopinath, Thara" <thara@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:56:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA3D6F8.4000709@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iq8sw3uf.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>

Kevin Hilman had written, on 03/19/2010 01:42 PM, the following:
> Felipe Balbi <me@felipebalbi.com> writes:
> 
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:46:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> IMO, Using BUG* macros usually indicates improper or incomplete error
>>> handling rather than a real catastrophic system failure.
>> on the other hand a kernel oops and system hang will always get
>> noted. Rather than a WARN() which simply sits in the log buffer.
> 
> Of course, but what I'm trying to avoid is making other people deal
> with a BUG inserted by a developer when proper error checking and
> recovery is what is really needed.
> 
I respect your views. but a few moments of thoughts:
how would the recovery look like? I can think of 2 options here.. do 
share your views:

Option 1:
if (opp_init_list(OPP_MPU, omap3_opp_def_list[0])) {
	WARN("dsp OPP table registration failed");
	return;
}
if (opp_init_list(OPP_L3, omap3_opp_def_list[1])) {
	WARN("dsp OPP table registration failed");
	return;
}
if (opp_init_list(OPP_DSP, omap3_opp_def_list[2])) {
	WARN("dsp OPP table registration failed");
	return;
}

Option 2:
	if (opp_init_list(OPP_MPU, omap3_opp_def_list[0]))
		return;
	if (opp_init_list(OPP_L3, omap3_opp_def_list[1]))
		goto mpu_disable;
	if (opp_init_list(OPP_DSP, omap3_opp_def_list[2]))
		goto l3_disable;
	return;

l3_disable:
	freq = 0;
	while (!IS_ERR(opp = opp_find_freq_ceil(OPP_L3, &freq)) {
		opp_disable(opp);
		freq++;
	}
mpu_disable:
	freq = 0;
	while (!IS_ERR(opp = opp_find_freq_ceil(OPP_MPU, &freq)) {
		opp_disable(opp);
		freq++;
	}
	WARN("Registration of OPP tables failed!!");
	return;

Option 1 is a bad idea as it leaves the system in an invalid state
Option 2 is the better idea as we dont have a opp_delete option(not 
required usually).

All that code for something that will almost never happen?	
-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-19 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-18 18:44 [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 0/4] few opp layer cleanups Nishanth Menon
2010-03-18 18:44 ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup Nishanth Menon
2010-03-18 18:44   ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 2/4] omap: pm: opp: twl: use DIV_ROUND_UP Nishanth Menon
2010-03-18 18:44     ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 3/4] omap: pm: opp: add ability to store data per opp Nishanth Menon
2010-03-18 18:44       ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 4/4] omap3: srf: remove hardcoded opp dependency Nishanth Menon
2010-03-19 14:47         ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-19 15:36           ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-19 10:14       ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 3/4] omap: pm: opp: add ability to store data per opp Cousson, Benoit
2010-03-19 14:27         ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-19 14:43       ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-19 15:25         ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-19 17:47           ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-19 18:10             ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-21 21:50           ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-03-22 13:29             ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-22 17:46               ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-03-22 18:25                 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-23  5:06                   ` Gopinath, Thara
2010-03-23 13:00                     ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-23 16:12                       ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-03-23 20:04                         ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-18 22:49   ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup Kevin Hilman
2010-03-19 14:21     ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-19 14:50       ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-19 17:46       ` Kevin Hilman
2010-03-19 17:52         ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-19 18:42           ` Kevin Hilman
2010-03-19 19:56             ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2010-03-19 20:49               ` Kevin Hilman
2010-03-19 21:53                 ` Nishanth Menon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BA3D6F8.4000709@ti.com \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=ambresh@ti.com \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=eduardo.valentin@nokia.com \
    --cc=ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
    --cc=premi@ti.com \
    --cc=tero.kristo@nokia.com \
    --cc=thara@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox