From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: "me@felipebalbi.com" <me@felipebalbi.com>,
Linux-Omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"K, Ambresh" <ambresh@ti.com>,
"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@nokia.com>,
Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com>,
"Premi, Sanjeev" <premi@ti.com>,
Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>,
"Gopinath, Thara" <thara@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:56:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA3D6F8.4000709@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iq8sw3uf.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Kevin Hilman had written, on 03/19/2010 01:42 PM, the following:
> Felipe Balbi <me@felipebalbi.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:46:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> IMO, Using BUG* macros usually indicates improper or incomplete error
>>> handling rather than a real catastrophic system failure.
>> on the other hand a kernel oops and system hang will always get
>> noted. Rather than a WARN() which simply sits in the log buffer.
>
> Of course, but what I'm trying to avoid is making other people deal
> with a BUG inserted by a developer when proper error checking and
> recovery is what is really needed.
>
I respect your views. but a few moments of thoughts:
how would the recovery look like? I can think of 2 options here.. do
share your views:
Option 1:
if (opp_init_list(OPP_MPU, omap3_opp_def_list[0])) {
WARN("dsp OPP table registration failed");
return;
}
if (opp_init_list(OPP_L3, omap3_opp_def_list[1])) {
WARN("dsp OPP table registration failed");
return;
}
if (opp_init_list(OPP_DSP, omap3_opp_def_list[2])) {
WARN("dsp OPP table registration failed");
return;
}
Option 2:
if (opp_init_list(OPP_MPU, omap3_opp_def_list[0]))
return;
if (opp_init_list(OPP_L3, omap3_opp_def_list[1]))
goto mpu_disable;
if (opp_init_list(OPP_DSP, omap3_opp_def_list[2]))
goto l3_disable;
return;
l3_disable:
freq = 0;
while (!IS_ERR(opp = opp_find_freq_ceil(OPP_L3, &freq)) {
opp_disable(opp);
freq++;
}
mpu_disable:
freq = 0;
while (!IS_ERR(opp = opp_find_freq_ceil(OPP_MPU, &freq)) {
opp_disable(opp);
freq++;
}
WARN("Registration of OPP tables failed!!");
return;
Option 1 is a bad idea as it leaves the system in an invalid state
Option 2 is the better idea as we dont have a opp_delete option(not
required usually).
All that code for something that will almost never happen?
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 18:44 [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 0/4] few opp layer cleanups Nishanth Menon
2010-03-18 18:44 ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup Nishanth Menon
2010-03-18 18:44 ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 2/4] omap: pm: opp: twl: use DIV_ROUND_UP Nishanth Menon
2010-03-18 18:44 ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 3/4] omap: pm: opp: add ability to store data per opp Nishanth Menon
2010-03-18 18:44 ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 4/4] omap3: srf: remove hardcoded opp dependency Nishanth Menon
2010-03-19 14:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-19 15:36 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-19 10:14 ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 3/4] omap: pm: opp: add ability to store data per opp Cousson, Benoit
2010-03-19 14:27 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-19 14:43 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-19 15:25 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-19 17:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-19 18:10 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-21 21:50 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-03-22 13:29 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-22 17:46 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-03-22 18:25 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-23 5:06 ` Gopinath, Thara
2010-03-23 13:00 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-23 16:12 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-03-23 20:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-18 22:49 ` [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup Kevin Hilman
2010-03-19 14:21 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-03-19 14:50 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-19 17:46 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-03-19 17:52 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-19 18:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-03-19 19:56 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2010-03-19 20:49 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-03-19 21:53 ` Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA3D6F8.4000709@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=ambresh@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=eduardo.valentin@nokia.com \
--cc=ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
--cc=premi@ti.com \
--cc=tero.kristo@nokia.com \
--cc=thara@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox