From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] DSPBRIDGE: use dm timer framework for gpt timers Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:22:57 -0500 Message-ID: <4BD86EF1.9080207@ti.com> References: <1272418167-12630-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1272418167-12630-4-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1272418167-12630-5-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1272418167-12630-6-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1272418167-12630-7-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1272418167-12630-8-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1272418167-12630-9-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1272418167-12630-10-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1272418167-12630-11-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1272418167-12630-12-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <4BD8430B.80909@ti.com> <87bpd3h774.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <4BD863FE.80804@ti.com> <4BD869A1.8070808@ti.com> <4BD86C41.3030401@nt.tu-darmstadt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:32875 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752987Ab0D1RXJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:23:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BD86C41.3030401@nt.tu-darmstadt.de> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Vladimir Pantelic Cc: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" , Kevin Hilman , Felipe Contreras , linux-omap , Ameya Palande , Hiroshi Doyu , Felipe Contreras , Omar Ramirez Luna Vladimir Pantelic had written, on 04/28/2010 12:11 PM, the following: > Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: > >> yes, dsp side wants: >> bios --> GPT5 (only used during boot up -> baseimage load) >> load monitoring --> GPT 6 (used while the dsp is awake) >> AV Sync --> GPT 8 (based on use case) >> >> to generate the interrupt for mmu fault case it needs one connected to >> the dsp interrupt line and only 5, 6, 7 or 8 apply. > > and it is also GPT8 for mmu fault handling atm. > > So, as GPT8 is one of the PWM capable, could that functionality be moved > to GPT7? > Obvious good point instead to tell DSP BIOS which timers to use as part of the params we pass to the DSP similar to what we do with frequencies for DSP Load balancer to work.. makes it scalable and does not allow DSP to hog a timer which could be used for LCD backlight dimming with PWM for example.. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon