From: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
To: Vimal Singh <vimal.newwork@gmail.com>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, s-ghorai@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap: gpmc-nand: add ability to keep timings defined by the bootloader
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:27:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD934E5.5080904@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <g2qce9ab5791004290011w84f68a4ak3e24acdc74016265@mail.gmail.com>
Vimal Singh wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il> wrote:
>> Vimal Singh wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
>>>> + if (gpmc_nand_data->keep_timings) {
>>>> + gpmc_nand_detect_timings();
>>>> + gpmc_nand_data->gpmc_t = &gpmc_default_timings;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>> I guess moving this part to omap2_nand_gpmc_retime will be a good idea.
>>> As there, once we get old/default timings we can simply skip the
>>> rounding part and directly jump to setting the timings.
>> This way it would be the same as to pass 'gpmc_nand_data->gpmc_t =
>> NULL'. If I correctly understood the previous comments ([1]), the
>> problem with skipping retime is that when L3 clock changes, the gpmc
>> timings became wrong. So, if we convert old/default timings to
>> nanoseconds early during startup every time retime is called it will use
>> the timing settings in nanoseconds thus yielding proper gpmc registers
>> configuration.
>
> OK. Then I think we can at least put __rounding__ code inside an 'if'
> case, something like:
> if (!gpmc_nand_data->keep_timings) {
> ...
> do rounding for supplied timings from board file.
> ...
> }
Sure, no problem.
>> And, if I'm not terribly mistaken retime should be called each time L3
>> frequency changes, though with current kernel it's not yet the case...
>
> Yes. This is still left.
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-30 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-28 16:06 [PATCH 0/2] omap: gpmc-nand: add ability to keep timings defined by the bootloader Mike Rapoport
2010-04-28 16:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] omap: gpmc: add gpmc_cs_get_timings Mike Rapoport
2010-04-28 16:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] omap: gpmc-nand: add ability to keep timings defined by the bootloader Mike Rapoport
2010-04-29 4:27 ` Vimal Singh
2010-04-29 6:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-04-29 7:11 ` Vimal Singh
2010-04-29 7:27 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BD934E5.5080904@compulab.co.il \
--to=mike@compulab.co.il \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s-ghorai@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vimal.newwork@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox