From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Igor Stoppa Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 17:14:31 +0300 Message-ID: <4BFFCFC7.7070302@nokia.com> References: <20100527220949.GB10602@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527232357.6d14fdb2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527223605.GB11364@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527235546.09f3ce8a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100528043114.GC26177@thunk.org> <20100528103713.0a7952d9@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100528114123.GA22947@srcf.ucam.org> <4BFFB681.1000105@nokia.com> <4BFFC5DF.5030504@nokia.com> <20100528133900.GG26177@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:28138 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755788Ab0E1OSS (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2010 10:18:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100528133900.GG26177@thunk.org> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: tytso@mit.edu, Igor Stoppa , ext Brian Swetland , ext Matthew Garrett , Alan Cox , Peter ext tytso@mit.edu wrote: > Linus will disagree with you there. Linus *has* merged code on the > basis that it is shipping in distributions, regardless of the fact > that some developers objected to it. Sometimes "perfect" should not > be the enemy of "good enough" shipping code. > "good enough" is very subjective, in this case > If everyone agrees we're making progress, and we can let this 100+ > mail thread keep going. I have seen very good proposals for saner solutions. Is that progress? igor