From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] omap4: Temporary fix silicon version detection Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:47:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4C88D75C.4020209@ti.com> References: <1284031395-25988-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1284031395-25988-2-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1284031395-25988-3-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <20100909114255.GK21060@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <4C88C940.6070000@ti.com> <20100909120746.GB17000@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:45993 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752179Ab0IIMrb (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:47:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100909120746.GB17000@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Balbi, Felipe" Cc: "Shilimkar, Santosh" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "tony@atomide.com" , "khilman@deeprootsystems.com" On 9/9/2010 2:07 PM, Balbi, Felipe wrote: > Hi Santosh, > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 07:02:46AM -0500, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: >> Felipe is suggesting not to add this support where as you want to >> have this support. >> >> Sorry if I haven't understood the comment. Care to clarify > > no, I suggested not to revert :-) So, just change the comment saying why > you need that extra check and remove the "this patch should be reverted > later" part :-) We are fully aligned. On the other hand if the number of buggy devices is very limited and not available outside TI, we'd better drop that patch. But I'm afraid it is not the case :-( Benoit