From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: "Varadarajan, Charulatha" <charu@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
"Menon, Nishanth" <nm@ti.com>, "wim@iguana.be" <wim@iguana.be>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>,
"Basak, Partha" <p-basak2@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP2PLUS: WDT: Fix: Disable WDT after reset during init
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:57:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CA4C17F.7060106@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EAF47CD23C76F840A9E7FCE10091EFAB030CCF813E@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
On 9/30/2010 5:55 PM, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote:
> Tony/ Benoit,
>
>>>
>>> I think that disabling it should be done only if the CONFIG_OMAP_WDT
>>> is not set.
>>
>> How about disabling is done always unless CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT
>> is set?
>
> As given in the patch description, this patch does a disable of watchdog
> timer, during init, to avoid the system rebooting that happens due to
> enabling of watchdog timer after a reset of the module (during hwmod init).
>
> According to the default WDT registers values, the system reboot would
> happen in ~10s if watchdog is enabled with default values. Hence, after
> a WDT module reset during init, the watchdog has to be disabled within 10s
> otherwise the system will keep rebooting.
>
> Hence irrespective of CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT/ CONFIG_OMAP_WDT,
> the watchdog timer needs to be disabled after a WDT reset has happened.
No, not necessarily, this is the whole point about a watchdog, you need
just need to ping it to prove that the system is alive.
In case you didn't notice, every watchdogs are started during a cold
reset since OMAP1610. Even Phoenix contains a watchdog that is started
by default.
This is by construction... and this is done like that for a good reason.
So stopping a watchdog just after the reset in a bootloader is not
necessarily the behavior that user of a watchdog are expecting,
otherwise it will not be started by default at boot time.
In your description, it looks like this behavior is a HW bug that we
have to fix... It is just the way it is supposed to work.
Regards,
Benoit
>
> Later on, the watchdog timer probe would be called (if CONFIG_OMAP_WDT
> is defined) which takes care of doing the regular the watchdog timer
> settings. After this, normal operations like open, close, ioctl operations
> are supported (if CONFIG_OMAP_WDT is defined).
> Based on CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT definition, disabling the watchdog
> may/may not be supported.
>
> Hence omap2_disable_wdt() introduced in this patch is not going to affect
> the watchdog operations in anyway execpt that it is fixing the reboot issue
> observed due to a watchdog timer reset. And this has to be done irrespective
> of any OMAP watchdog timer related flags.
>
> I guess, omap_wdt_disable() call during the WDT probe might be due to
> similar reasons.
>
>> That way product kernels can set CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT
>> and for the rest of us we can let fsck run the standard Linux way.
>>
>> Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-30 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-30 8:11 [PATCH] OMAP2PLUS: WDT: Fix: Disable WDT after reset during init Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-09-30 9:07 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-09-30 13:55 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-09-30 14:12 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-09-30 14:51 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-09-30 15:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-30 15:55 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-09-30 16:32 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-09-30 16:43 ` Paul Walmsley
2010-09-30 16:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-30 16:46 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-09-30 16:57 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2010-09-30 17:06 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-09-30 17:05 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-30 17:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-10-01 7:26 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-10-01 13:33 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-10-01 14:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-10-01 17:12 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-09-30 13:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-09-30 16:36 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CA4C17F.7060106@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=charu@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=p-basak2@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).