From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: "srinath@mistralsolutions.com" <srinath@mistralsolutions.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kridner, Jason" <jdk@ti.com>,
"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
"khilman@deeprootsystems.com" <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
"nagendra@mistralsolutions.com" <nagendra@mistralsolutions.com>,
"umeshk@mistralsolutions.com" <umeshk@mistralsolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: AM3517/05: Add craneboard support
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:52:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC91DB3.1050401@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288017943-6651-1-git-send-email-srinath@mistralsolutions.com>
Hi,
Looking much better now, thanks.
Few suggestion, not usually well documented, but a convention nevertheless:
$subject: might be a good idea to do the following for revision of patch
original patch [PATCH] is considered v1
next revision such as this is considered v2 [PATCH v2] is useful for
people to keep track of the revision of patch under discussion.
when you post with git send-email especially in a follow on patch, add
--in-reply-to "Original patch subject" - this helps mail readers like
gmail/thunderbird etc to properly group them up for the receiver.
Honestly, I forget to do this most of the time, but is a good practice
to have nonetheless.
srinath@mistralsolutions.com had written, on 10/25/2010 09:45 AM, the
following:
> From: Srinath <srinath@mistralsolutions.com>
>
> This patch adds basic board file. Detailed support will follow in
> subsequent patches.
>
> [1] http://www.ti.com/sitara
> [2] http://www.mistralsolutions.com/products/craneboard.php
Look at other board file addition examples - for example:
IGEP - commit ID: 58e111621d402d41cb0cabae7c532d6194b7d943
it gives a brief description of
a) what the board is
b) overall resemblance to other boards
c) idea about the family of silicon involved
when you give a link - we in the linux-omap probably have heard about
sitara family of processors, but the patch needs to go down to linux-arm
and lkml - where progressively, the processor is not probably not that
well heard of :). it might be nice to state OMAP3 family of processors
to give the reviewer an idea about what is being talked about.
http://omapedia.org/wiki/Releasing_to_Linux_kernel_using_patches_and_emails#Note_on_git_commit_comments
See the point on "Suggestions for Commit messages:"
>
> This patch has been created against omap-next branch.
This is not something you'd like to see in kernel.org commit message
right? this is the type of info which could easily fit into diffstat
section.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinath <srinath@mistralsolutions.com>
> ---
this side of the patch is called the diffstat - >from here to the first
diff does not get into the git history when committed with git am - so
we can add quiet a few things here
Since this is v2 of the patch series, few suggestions
a) "This patch has been created against omap-next branch" is nice thing
to do -> keep in mind, with omap-for-linus being merged to kernel.org,
you may want to base further changes on kernel.org - but if you state
something to the maintainer, this is the place to do it
b) when you post v2 of a patch, keep in mind you'd like to help a reader
who might have missed reviewing your previous patch to review this one
in context to the previous patches as well.. at least the rule I try to
follow is to have the diffstat of a later series contain details as follows:
v2: change 1
change 2
did not do change 3 - reason why..
v1: link of the discussion, I prefer using marc.info as it can give me a
complete thread easily, for example, I'd post a link like this:
http://marc.info/?t=128801458500004&r=1&w=2
Reason for doing this:
a) having additional reviewers improves your code
b) for an old reviewer, v2 sections tell him/her what has changed and he
can focus to those changes alone, rest he has already seen
b) for a new reviewer, v1 gives a context of previous discussion, v2
tells him/her what actions where taken by the author as a result and
provide comments in reference to that.
Note: this is a bit of a pain as the patch goes through multiple
iterations, but as far as I saw, it has at least helped my patches at
times :).
> arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 5 ++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-am3517crane.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/uncompress.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-am3517crane.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig
> index ccedde1..8c93f86 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_LDP=y
> CONFIG_MACH_OVERO=y
> CONFIG_MACH_OMAP3EVM=y
> CONFIG_MACH_OMAP3517EVM=y
> +CONFIG_MACH_CRANEBOARD=y
> CONFIG_MACH_OMAP3_PANDORA=y
> CONFIG_MACH_OMAP3_TOUCHBOOK=y
> CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_3430SDP=y
I suggest you drop this change -> leave it to Tony when he creates his
usual defconfig cleanups :)
look at commit ids:
58e111621d402d41cb0cabae7c532d6194b7d943 - IGEP board
b075f58b2c0f377b4bfbe11b817e003393bcb489 - PandaBoard
for examples how the board introductions have been done recently.
[...]
rest looks ok to me.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-28 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-25 14:45 [PATCH] OMAP: AM3517/05: Add craneboard support srinath
2010-10-28 6:52 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC91DB3.1050401@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=jdk@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagendra@mistralsolutions.com \
--cc=srinath@mistralsolutions.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=umeshk@mistralsolutions.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox