From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, Tony <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] omap: opp: add OMAP3 OPP table data and common init
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:53:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE1D5FD.2010109@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101115235153.25f7021e@surf>
Thomas Petazzoni had written, on 11/15/2010 04:51 PM, the following:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:27:39 -0600
> Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/opp3xxx_data.h
>> +
>> +static struct omap_opp_def __initdata omap34xx_opp_def_list[] = {
>> +
>> +static struct omap_opp_def __initdata omap36xx_opp_def_list[] = {
>
> Do we really want to have structure definitions in an header file ?
> Unless I'm wrong, this means that if the opp3xxx_data.h file is
> included in two different C files, the structures will be present twice.
The intent here - DONT DO precisely THAT!
>
> As far as I could see, most of the kernel instantiate structure in C
> files instead.
The intent here though was that opp3xx.h and opp4xx.h are private to
just opp.c to prevent misuse elsewhere. hmm.. thinking a bit,
find drivers/ -iname "*.c"|xargs grep "#include"| grep -v "\.h"
shows numerous examples of .c files being included in c files. I dont
have an issue of renaming these headers as .c file instead (I had
carried them over as .h from old implementation, but we can change it),
main point being, I just dont want folks mucking around and hacking
stuff with the defines.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-16 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <[PATCH 0/3 v2] omap: opp: Add opp data>
2010-11-15 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] OMAP: Add opp data Nishanth Menon
2010-11-15 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] omap: opp: add OMAP3 OPP table data and common init Nishanth Menon
2010-11-15 22:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-16 0:53 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2010-11-16 20:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-11-16 21:11 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 11:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-16 11:54 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 12:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-16 13:10 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 13:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-16 14:02 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 15:23 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 15:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-16 15:56 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 16:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-11-16 20:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-11-17 8:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-15 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] omap4: opp: add OPP table data Nishanth Menon
2010-11-15 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] OMAP3: remove OPP interfaces from OMAP PM layer Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CE1D5FD.2010109@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox