public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, Tony <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] omap: opp: add OMAP3 OPP table data and common init
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:53:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE1D5FD.2010109@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101115235153.25f7021e@surf>

Thomas Petazzoni had written, on 11/15/2010 04:51 PM, the following:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:27:39 -0600
> Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> 
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/opp3xxx_data.h
>> +
>> +static struct omap_opp_def __initdata omap34xx_opp_def_list[] = {
>> +
>> +static struct omap_opp_def __initdata omap36xx_opp_def_list[] = {
> 
> Do we really want to have structure definitions in an header file ?
> Unless I'm wrong, this means that if the opp3xxx_data.h file is
> included in two different C files, the structures will be present twice.
The intent here - DONT DO precisely THAT!
> 
> As far as I could see, most of the kernel instantiate structure in C
> files instead.
The intent here though was that opp3xx.h and opp4xx.h are private to 
just opp.c to prevent misuse elsewhere. hmm.. thinking a bit,
find drivers/ -iname "*.c"|xargs grep "#include"| grep -v "\.h"
shows numerous examples of .c files being included in c files. I dont 
have an issue of renaming these headers as .c file instead (I had 
carried them over as .h from old implementation, but we can change it), 
main point being, I just dont want folks mucking around and hacking 
stuff with the defines.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-16  0:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <[PATCH 0/3 v2] omap: opp: Add opp data>
2010-11-15 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] OMAP: Add opp data Nishanth Menon
2010-11-15 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] omap: opp: add OMAP3 OPP table data and common init Nishanth Menon
2010-11-15 22:51   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-16  0:53     ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2010-11-16 20:35       ` Tony Lindgren
2010-11-16 21:11         ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 11:21   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-16 11:54     ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 12:42       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-16 13:10         ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 13:20           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-16 14:02             ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 15:23         ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 15:50           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-16 15:56             ` Nishanth Menon
2010-11-16 16:16             ` Kevin Hilman
2010-11-16 20:37               ` Tony Lindgren
2010-11-17  8:19               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-11-15 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] omap4: opp: add OPP table data Nishanth Menon
2010-11-15 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] OMAP3: remove OPP interfaces from OMAP PM layer Nishanth Menon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CE1D5FD.2010109@ti.com \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox