From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: "Gopinath, Thara" <thara@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>,
"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>,
"Sripathy, Vishwanath" <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>,
"Sawant, Anand" <sawant@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/9] OMAP3: PM: Adding debug support to Voltage and Smartreflex drivers
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:34:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CFFB397.60203@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB0373831615@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
Gopinath, Thara had written, on 12/08/2010 10:18 AM, the following:
[..]
>>> And, AFAICT, it wasn't clear from the current code or docs whether this
>>> could work or was expected to work either, e.g., if you set
>>> override_volt_params back to zero, to the original values all get reused?
>>>
>>> If you want to provide this feature, then it should be documented and
>>> made clear that this is an intended goal.
>>>
>>> Thinking about this more, the main thing I don't like about this
>>> approach is that the active code paths (enable & disable) have to check
>>> each time if any of these values have been overidden.
>>>
>>> Rather than have several places in the active code paths where this
>>> override value is checked, there the sysfs methods should simply update
>>> the values that are used by the core code. This way, the core would
>>> not need to know about where the values came from (defalts, volt_data,
>>> user override, etc.)
>>>
>>> If you want to provide a way to revert this, then maybe writing -1 will
>>> should switch that value back to the HW default, or volt_data default.
> Kevin, Benoit, Nishant et al,
>
> Without this override flag today there is no direct way of
> allowing user to write into these parameters. My question is,
Glancing at the debug entries being overidden, as developer (debug
users) working for tweaking parameters for their platform - yes - we
will need some mechanism to runtime tweak and see the behavior without
needing to rebuild the kernel everytime.
On production system (OS users): they should'nt be using this.
> is there a need for the parameters to be over-written
> from the user-space? If yes, I need ideas on how to
> implement it with using override_volt_params !
Lets get the basics in kernel.org in some form! IMHO, all this double
knobs are un-necessary overheads in codeflow for development only code-
just provide the debugfs entries that reflect the data in their original
structures, use the original structures everytime we go to a new
transition (aka if you change the params in debugfs, they dont take
effect till you do another transition).. but that is just my 2cents.
---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-27 16:10 [PATCH v4 0/9] OMAP3: Adding Smartreflex and Voltage driver support Thara Gopinath
2010-10-27 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] OMAP3: PM: Adding voltage driver support for OMAP3 Thara Gopinath
2010-11-10 18:59 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-11-15 10:47 ` Gopinath, Thara
[not found] ` <FCCFB4CDC6E5564B9182F639FC356087034C012076@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
2010-11-15 14:55 ` Gopinath, Thara
[not found] ` <87hbfp9gli.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
[not found] ` <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB035EFF4E51@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
2010-11-15 19:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-12-02 6:13 ` Gopinath, Thara
2010-10-27 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] OMAP3: PM: Adding smartreflex driver support Thara Gopinath
2010-10-27 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] OMAP3: PM: Adding smartreflex device file Thara Gopinath
2010-10-28 5:38 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-10-28 15:26 ` Gopinath, Thara
2010-10-29 4:48 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-10-27 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] OMAP3: PM: Adding smartreflex hwmod data Thara Gopinath
2010-10-27 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] OMAP3: PM: Adding smartreflex class3 driver Thara Gopinath
2010-10-27 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] OMAP3: PM: Adding T2 enabling of smartreflex support Thara Gopinath
2010-10-27 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] OMAP3: PM: Adding debug support to Voltage and Smartreflex drivers Thara Gopinath
2010-11-10 19:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-11-15 11:00 ` Gopinath, Thara
2010-11-15 22:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-12-08 16:18 ` Gopinath, Thara
2010-12-08 16:34 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2010-12-09 9:43 ` Gopinath, Thara
2010-12-09 11:23 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-09 14:13 ` Gopinath, Thara
2010-12-09 17:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-12-09 17:22 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-10-27 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] OMAP3: PM: Program correct init voltages for VDD1 and VDD2 Thara Gopinath
2010-10-27 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] OMAP3: PM: Register TWL4030 pmic info with the voltage driver Thara Gopinath
2010-10-27 17:21 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] OMAP3: Adding Smartreflex and Voltage driver support Nishanth Menon
2010-10-28 15:32 ` Gopinath, Thara
2010-11-10 19:03 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CFFB397.60203@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=sawant@ti.com \
--cc=thara@ti.com \
--cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).