From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: omap_device: use pdev as parameter to get rt_va
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:12:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D05D586.6090408@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292024742-27319-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Hi Omar,
On 12/11/2010 12:45 AM, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> Make the parameter received by omap_device_get_mpu_rt_va
> consistent with the functions meant to be called by drivers.
>
> Also move its header declaration to appear in the set of
> functions to be used by drivers, as per the comment there.
Please note that even if Paul submitted this API upon request from
Santosh, we do not want driver to us it most of the time.
All drivers should us the generic Linux way to get physical mem resource
and then ioremap it.
I assume that if you want to update this API, you are probably already
using it.
Why cannot you use the generic way?
Regards,
Benoit
>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna<omar.ramirez@ti.com>
> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman<khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h | 3 +--
> arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 8 ++++++--
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h
> index 28e2d1a..1877c1a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct omap_device {
> int omap_device_enable(struct platform_device *pdev);
> int omap_device_idle(struct platform_device *pdev);
> int omap_device_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev);
> +void __iomem *omap_device_get_rt_va(struct platform_device *pdev);
>
> /* Core code interface */
>
> @@ -101,8 +102,6 @@ struct omap_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id,
> int omap_device_register(struct omap_device *od);
> int omap_early_device_register(struct omap_device *od);
>
> -void __iomem *omap_device_get_rt_va(struct omap_device *od);
> -
> /* OMAP PM interface */
> int omap_device_align_pm_lat(struct platform_device *pdev,
> u32 new_wakeup_lat_limit);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
> index abe933c..9d11195 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
> @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ struct powerdomain *omap_device_get_pwrdm(struct omap_device *od)
>
> /**
> * omap_device_get_mpu_rt_va - return the MPU's virtual addr for the hwmod base
> - * @od: struct omap_device *
> + * @pdev: struct platform_device *
> *
> * Return the MPU's virtual address for the base of the hwmod, from
> * the ioremap() that the hwmod code does. Only valid if there is one
> @@ -690,8 +690,12 @@ struct powerdomain *omap_device_get_pwrdm(struct omap_device *od)
> * otherwise, passes along the return value from
> * omap_hwmod_get_mpu_rt_va().
> */
> -void __iomem *omap_device_get_rt_va(struct omap_device *od)
> +void __iomem *omap_device_get_rt_va(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + struct omap_device *od;
> +
> + od = _find_by_pdev(pdev);
> +
> if (od->hwmods_cnt != 1)
> return NULL;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-13 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-10 23:45 [PATCH] OMAP: omap_device: use pdev as parameter to get rt_va Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-13 8:12 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2010-12-13 18:08 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2010-12-15 0:17 ` Paul Walmsley
2010-12-15 1:12 ` Paul Walmsley
2010-12-15 8:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-15 14:53 ` Paul Walmsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D05D586.6090408@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=omar.ramirez@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox