From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: PM: Adding T2 enabling of smartreflex Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 07:37:22 -0600 Message-ID: <4D247412.5070008@ti.com> References: <1293782878-9756-1-git-send-email-thara@ti.com> <4D21F09D.3040007@ti.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB0373D2F0E0@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.209]:42519 "EHLO na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751257Ab1AENhe (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2011 08:37:34 -0500 Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so5938459gyg.8 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 05:37:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB0373D2F0E0@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Gopinath, Thara" Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "khilman@deeprootsystems.com" , "paul@pwsan.com" , "Cousson, Benoit" , "Sripathy, Vishwanath" , "Sawant, Anand" Gopinath, Thara wrote, on 01/05/2011 04:46 AM: [..] > Yes you are right. The SR I2C needs to be enabled for vp force update > and vc bypass method of voltage scaling as well as for smartreflex > feature. Are you telling that there are platforms out there using OMAP3 > and T2 and still using VMODE or VSEL. As far as I am aware our h/w folks themselves do not recommend these methods. ;) not every one likes to follow recommendations rt? but yeah, there are folks who use vmode for 3430, vsel is possible even for 3630 - using class2 implementation if desired or forced to if the SR lines are not hooked up on the board. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon