From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brad Parker Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:43:15 -0500 Message-ID: <4D25E313.4060202@heeltoe.com> References: <20101223171859.f6842045.sfr@canb.auug.org.au><4D139517.3010608@ti.com> <4ce0f816f951f24ca3de9c84d9f70842@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20110106_100805_509520_6CE1697E) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4ce0f816f951f24ca3de9c84d9f70842@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20110106_100805_509520_6CE1697E) Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Anand Gadiyar Cc: Ming Lei , Benoit Cousson , Stephen Rothwell , Paul Walmsley , Greg KH , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org It's probably expected, but I can't get the EHCI USB port to work on a beagle board XM (36xx) using the current omap tree. It this most likely due to these clock issues? the (very old) angstrom 2.6.32 kernel works fine, as a comparison. -brad