From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:48:34 +0530 Message-ID: <4D59F08A.7080907@ti.com> References: <1296798454-23755-1-git-send-email-shweta.gulati@ti.com> <87y65iz22v.fsf@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog109.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.201]:46185 "EHLO na3sys009aog109.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751192Ab1BODSl (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:18:41 -0500 Received: by mail-yw0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 21so2600081ywc.21 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:18:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87y65iz22v.fsf@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: Shweta Gulati , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Thara Gopinath , Sanjeev Premi Kevin Hilman wrote, on 02/15/2011 03:54 AM: > "Menon, Nishanth" writes: > >> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:17, Shweta Gulati wrote: >>> From: Thara Gopinath >>> >> Gentle ping - folks after 8 days no comments, does this rev address >> all previous comments? if so, it might be good to get some acks ;) > > Gentle reminder. Patchwork[1] keeps a queue of patches pending > review/merge etc. If it's in patchwork it will get reviewed, most > likely in the order it was received. > > There are lots of going on recently, so we have a good sized queue in > patchwork. Ofcourse, the intent of the ping here was for other reviewers of patches from v2/v3 of this patch to provide their inputs so that we can move this forward. Btw, other than maintainer, I am not completely sure if ML based reviewers review based on patchworks sequencing ;). -- Regards, Nishanth Menon