public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: archit taneja <archit@ti.com>
To: "Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: OMAP: DSS2: Common IRQ handler for all OMAPs
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:50:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5A3761.2090103@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110215080555.GB2570@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>

Hi,

On Tuesday 15 February 2011 01:35 PM, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:58:24AM +0530, archit taneja wrote:
>>> does it make sense to install an irq_chip for that ? I mean, can you
>>> mask/unmask dss and or dsi IRQs ? If you can, then it might make sense
>>> to take a look into GENIRQ and install an irq_chip for that. Then both
>>> dsi and dss would be able to use standard request_irq() API.
>>>
>>
>> We could disable dsi IRQs by masking all the possible interrupt
>> events in DSI_IRQSTATUS. The same goes for dispc. Is this what you
>> meant by masking/unmasking irqs?
>
> yes it is. Then it makes sense to have an irq_chip for those two irqs, I
> think.
>
> /proc/interrupt will reflect how the hardware works (DSI and DISPC IRQs
> being handled by DSS), both dsi and dispc can use normal request_irq()
> without setting IRQF_SHARED, etc etc. All you need to do is:
>
> static struct irq_chip dss_irq_chip = {
> 	.name			= "DSS",
> 	.irq_bus_lock		= dss_bus_lock,
> 	.irq_bus_sync_unlock	= dss_bus_sync_unlock,
> 	.irq_mask		= dss_irq_mask,
> 	.irq_unmask		= dss_irq_unmask,
> 	.irq_ack		= dss_irq_ack,
> };
>
> then, somewhere during probe() you have to:
>
> for (irq = irq_base; irq<  irq_end; irq++) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> 	set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID)
> #else
> 	set_irq_noprobe(irq);
> #endif
>
> 	set_irq_data(irq, dss_device_structure_pointer);
> 	set_irq_chip_and_handler(irq,&dss_irq_chip,
> 		handle_simple_irq);
> }
>
> and on exit() you just need to cleanup:
>
> for (irq = irq_base; irq<  irq_end; irq++) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> 	set_irq_flags(irq, 0)
> #endif
>
> 	set_irq_chip_and_handler(irq, NULL, NULL);
> 	set_irq_data(irq, NULL);
> }
>

Thanks for the info, but this seems to be suitable for the case
when there are multiple irq events coming from the same interrupt line. 
On OMAP4 we have 4 different IRQ lines going to ARM, i.e 4 lines defined 
in irqs-44xx.h.

We are looking for a common irq handler located somewhere centrally, and 
each module can hook their irq line to this handler.

Does irq_chip do this? what does irq_base and irq_end signify?

Regards,
Archit

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-15  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-02  8:56 [PATCH] OMAP: DSS2: Common IRQ handler for all OMAPs Archit Taneja
2011-02-14 14:21 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-02-14 14:30   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-02-15  4:28     ` archit taneja
2011-02-15  7:27       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-02-15  8:30         ` archit taneja
2011-02-15  8:37           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-02-15  8:47             ` archit taneja
2011-02-15  9:25             ` archit taneja
2011-02-15 10:23               ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-02-15 10:28                 ` Semwal, Sumit
2011-02-15 10:50                   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-02-15 12:43                     ` archit taneja
2011-02-15 12:56                       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-02-15 10:57             ` Felipe Balbi
2011-02-15 11:25               ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-02-15 11:42                 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-02-15  8:05       ` Felipe Balbi
2011-02-15  8:20         ` archit taneja [this message]
2011-02-15  8:23           ` Felipe Balbi
2011-02-15  7:45     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-02-15  8:03       ` archit taneja

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D5A3761.2090103@ti.com \
    --to=archit@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox