From: Raghuveer Murthy <x0075817@ti.com>
To: "paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
"Murthy, Raghuveer" <raghuveer.murthy@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] OMAP4: DSS2: Adding fclk support for DPI interface
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:27:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5B9176.5060000@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297699342.2951.62.camel@deskari>
On Monday 14 February 2011 09:32 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 07:56 -0600, Murthy, Raghuveer wrote:
>> - Adding dss_feature for DPLL fclk
>> - Enabling pixel clock generation for DPI interface
>
> A bit more description what the patch set is about would be nice. Also,
> one line patch descriptions are a bit too short for anything else than
> the most trivial patches.
>
> Now to the actual patch contents:
>
> DPLL is not a feature of the DSS, and I don't think we should have
> dss_features for that. In fact, I think the whole DPLL code should be
> moved from DSS to somewhere under arch/arm.
>
> In a perfect world DSS could just set the dss_fck to whatever rate it
> requires, but as the clock rate can only be set to certain rates, and we
> need a precise control for the rate, some other method has to be in
> place.
>
> I am not sure what this method should be. Perhaps there is something in
> the clock framework that could help us here, or perhaps we just need a
> bunch of function pointers in the DSS's platform data which can be used
> to configure the clock.
>
> Tomi
>
>
Hi Paul, Benoit,
DPLL_PER post divider output for DSS core functional clock can be
changed in OMAP3xxx and OMAP4430, based on the requested pixel clock for
a given display resolution.
Additionally, the number of dividers available for DPLL_PER post
dividors for DSS has increased from 16 to 32, from OMAP3630 onwards.
Both these are added as dss_features.
Given the above comments from Tomi, can the same be included as part of
the clock framework?
Regards,
Raghuveer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-03 13:56 [PATCH 0/4] OMAP4: DSS2: Adding fclk support for DPI interface Raghuveer Murthy
2011-02-03 13:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] OMAP: DSS2: Add dss_feature for variable DPLL fclk Raghuveer Murthy
2011-02-03 13:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] OMAP: DSS: Renaming the dpll clk pointer in struct dss Raghuveer Murthy
2011-02-03 13:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] OMAP: DSS2: Using dss_features to clean cpu checks for clocks Raghuveer Murthy
2011-02-03 13:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] OMAP: DSS2: Get OMAP4 DPLL fclk for DPI interface Raghuveer Murthy
2011-02-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 0/4] OMAP4: DSS2: Adding fclk support " Tomi Valkeinen
2011-02-16 8:57 ` Raghuveer Murthy [this message]
2011-02-16 16:32 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-02-17 14:49 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-02-17 19:16 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-02-18 15:40 ` Raghuveer Murthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D5B9176.5060000@ti.com \
--to=x0075817@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=raghuveer.murthy@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox