Re: [PATCH 12/19] omap3+: sr: disable interrupt by default

[Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>]

Kevin Hilman wrote, on 03/03/2011 06:29 AM:
> Nishanth Menon<nm@ti.com>  writes:
>
>> Kevin Hilman wrote, on 03/03/2011 05:45 AM:
>>> Nishanth Menon<nm@ti.com>   writes:
>>>
>>>> We will enable and disable interrupt on a need basis in the class
>>>> driver. we need to keep the irq disabled by default else the
>>>> forceupdate or vcbypass events could trigger events that we dont
>>>> need/expect to handle.
>>>
>>> It's not clear from the patch where the IRQ is re-enabled.  For example,
>>> without knowing better, I would expect a corresponding change to the
>>> Class 3 driver to enable/disable the IRQ as needed.
>>
>> Why would that be?
>> a) class 3 driver does not request for any notifiers
>> b) class 3 does'nt need interrupts.
>> c) each class driver can choose to enable when it needs it - class3 does'nt.
>>
>> is it fine if I add a "this is a preperation for class drivers such as
>> class 2 and class 1.5 which would need to use interrupts" in commit
>> message?
>
> Yes, also stating/summarizing that existing class driver (e.g. class 3)
> does not use interrupts would be helpful.
Ack. will do in v3.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon