From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] OMAP3+: introduce SR class 1.5 Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 07:00:01 +0530 Message-ID: <4D6EEF19.7010501@ti.com> References: <1298116918-30744-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <87aahdujox.fsf@ti.com> <4D6EE2D5.7040900@ti.com> <8762s1t3v4.fsf@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog109.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.201]:53297 "EHLO na3sys009aog109.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752391Ab1CCBaO (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:30:14 -0500 Received: by mail-vx0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 33so628746vxg.31 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:30:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8762s1t3v4.fsf@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: linux-omap , Tony Lindgren Kevin Hilman wrote, on 03/03/2011 06:30 AM: > Nishanth Menon writes: > >>> >>> - Please Cc linux-arm-kernel for patches intended for mainline. Because >>> of this, I didn't (yet) queue the ones I said I would queue. >> done that with v2 which I had happened to have posted yesterday :(: >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129906334611444&w=2 > > Doh, sorry. > > My backlog is deep enough that I hadn't seen your v2 yet. :/ nothing lost ;).. I guess we can skip it for the moment and look at v3 later this week.. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon